if the transfer fees, wages, and signing on fees are true then hazard will cost chavs 78 million. how can we compete with that?
if the transfer fees, wages, and signing on fees are true then hazard will cost chavs 78 million. how can we compete with that?
City refused his wage demands didn't they? Obviously the chavs haven't so that's where he's going.Originally Posted by ItsMe
Hazard is such a moneygrabber, signing for Chelsea when Man City would have paid him more....footballers these days
Für eure Sicherheit
I thought roman offered him more money?Hazard is such a moneygrabber, signing for Chelsea when Man City would have paid him more....footballers these days
£250'000k a week compared to citehs £200'000.
He agreed personal terms with all of them.
He chose Chelsea cos of football reasons
his agent was also paid 6 million by chelsea, im sure that had nothing to do with his decision and was only based on footballing reasons. nothing to do with agent trying to make money
also how can hazard choose chelsea for footballing reasons when he doenst even know who the manager will be. what happens if they sign a new manager who thinks he would be better in a different posistion to the one he wants, he said he wants assuarnaces over playing time and posistion but surely with no manager they cant give that? what happens if a new manager prefers mata in hazards role? is that still footballing reasons?
Im gonna have to read up more on the new FFP rules. How can Chelsea and Man City continue to spend so much more than they earn? I know that the rules dont come in properly til 2015 (and they are phased in for clubs making huge losses when the monitoring period started) but surely the big clubs are going to be under much more scrutiny? I'm sure one of the rich bastard owners will challenge the rules in the European Court of Justice claiming unlawful restraint of trade.
Don't be silly.
The guy has just whored himself around Europe. Smart move by him if he wants top dollar, I don't argue with that. I wouldn't even claim we were a realistic choice but if you are genuinely interested in football you go to Barca or Man Utd. If you want big cash you go to city or the chavs (or Barca the lucky ****s). Nothing hard to figure out about this player or his motives. Does this mean the chavs know who the manager will be already? Or is Hazard such a whore he really couldn't care less? The boy might get a few surprises when his ego bumps into Lumpard and Big Man.
Für eure Sicherheit
Some interesting comments there, you can ignore *******s as he talks nothing but sh*tWhat they say about Hazard
"Hazard is a very good player. He has many qualities. He is particularly rapid in the first 10 yards."
Manchester United manager Sir Alex Ferguson
"He can play in any top team in the world, today or tomorrow."
Manchester City captain Vincent Kompany
"His creative ability, his talent for unbalancing opponents, his vision of the game, and his consummate skill in making the final pass all make him an in-demand player."
Arsenal manager Arsène Wenger
"Eden is technically gifted and very fast. I would take him to Real Madrid with my eyes closed. He can become a great footballer, he is a star of the future".
Real Madrid director of football and former France international Zinedine Zidane
"Faster than Zidane, more technique than Thierry Henry."
Former France international Christophe Dugarry
"At times he looks like Lionel Messi."
Former Marseille manager Rolland Courbisbut the rest are impressive.
Quality cost money, Ronaldo cost a fortune but you don't see Real regretting their buy now. I agree we couldn't afford him, but he's not the only player around, we seem to want to pay peanuts, generally that buys you monkeys.
Posting Permissions
