The idea is that we offer a big contract now (at 29) which would last him to 33. By 33 he might not be worth the same money. But right now, we would have to offer a big contract. If we are not, maybe the problem is on our side - as Wenger has hinted, he feels a players peak ends before around 31/2 so it's possible we could be offering below what we could. So if Van Persie is leaving for money, it might not be just his fault - maybe Arsenal aren't offering enough. I have never ruled it out. When I say Van Persie could be leaving for money, some of you automatically think I'm putting the blame directly on Van Persie. As I've made clear from the start, I can't be bothered to waste energy being annoyed or blaming either party. We're just discussing possible reasons. Money's just as good as any other.
It hasn't been cited by players on very good contracts relative to what they'd potentially earn on their next move. As I said, I'm not interested in any bullshit definite statements. It's never just 'money' or 'trophies' or 'city' or any of the 100 different variables that'd affect such a choice. How important each choice is would vary from player to player.And let's not beat around the bush and act as if we don't know why players are leaving. This isn't a mystery. Lack of ambition has been cited by players on very good contracts to players on lows wages. There is a problem with the way this clubs run.