User Tag List

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 403

Thread: Goodbye Sanga?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Member Power n Glory's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    14,195
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Charlie the Gooner View Post
    We were always going to Balance the books whether song went or not, we always knew too top players would go, we knew RVP would and most would have said Theo too which would have been enough to balance the books.

    Likes its been Said it was the clubs decison to sell Song that does not mean he never wanted to leave once Barca came calling.
    The desire to balance the books was greater than keeping a hold of one of our best players. That's the issue. We have no resolve in these sort of situations and this was handled badly. We didn't want to tie him down to a longer contract and we didn't value him as a player.

  2. #2
    Member Olivier's xmas twist's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    16,417
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Wiltord's Winner View Post
    think its a case of both tbh

    song acted like a c*nt then barca showed interest

    if he was disruptive then it was the perfect opportunity to sell

    if we wanted to balance our spending then it was the perfect opportunity to sell

    either way he's a c*nt
    Think you have something there tbh. We all know the club would balance the books maybe this gave them the opportunity they needed and it would not look bad on them.


    Quote Originally Posted by Power_n_Glory View Post
    The desire to balance the books was greater than keeping a hold of one of our best players. That's the issue. We have no resolve in these sort of situations and this was handled badly. We didn't want to tie him down to a longer contract and we didn't value him as a player.
    Why should we have he had 3 years on his deal and had no need to discuss a new deal yet, this could have been sorted this year.

    Now Theo on the other hand is a diffrent matter.
    Last edited by Olivier's xmas twist; 06-09-2012 at 10:31 PM.

  3. #3
    ***** Niall_Quinn's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    69,086
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Give the ****s in charge the slightest excuse or encouragement and they'll sell. If it hadn't been Song it would have been Walcott. They make profits every year by selling so no surprise this year was more of the same. Or they are absolutely desperate to spend on players but Wenger won't let them and instead prefers to see the team sold off for a profit that doesn't even benefit him but does make him look like a failure and a ****. Whichever reason you prefer.
    Für eure Sicherheit

  4. #4
    Member Power n Glory's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    14,195
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Charlie the Gooner View Post
    Think you have something there tbh. We all know the club would balance the books maybe this gave them the opportunity they needed and it would not look bad on them.




    Why should we have he had 3 years on his deal and had no need to discuss a new deal yet, this could have been sorted this year.

    Now Theo on the other hand is a diffrent matter.
    So it makes sense to sell a player with three years left on his contract? We didn't value him as a player.

  5. #5
    Member Olivier's xmas twist's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    16,417
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Power_n_Glory View Post
    So it makes sense to sell a player with three years left on his contract? We didn't value him as a player.
    Nope it does not make sense to sell a player with 3 years on his deal for £15 Million, when we should have got at least £10 mill more. Or to the fact we could have sold him for the same next season.

    We all know he wanted more money thats clear and mabe he started acting out and the board and manager saw it easy to sell and Balance the books at the same time.

  6. #6
    Member Power n Glory's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    14,195
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    All too easy to start a rumour that becomes fact. the clubs trying to cover their own ass.

  7. #7
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    1,058
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Charlie the Gooner View Post
    Nope it does not make sense to sell a player with 3 years on his deal for £15 Million, when we should have got at least £10 mill more. Or to the fact we could have sold him for the same next season.

    We all know he wanted more money thats clear and mabe he started acting out and the board and manager saw it easy to sell and Balance the books at the same time.
    £25m+ for Song?

  8. #8
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    6,923
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Power_n_Glory View Post
    The desire to balance the books was greater than keeping a hold of one of our best players. That's the issue. We have no resolve in these sort of situations and this was handled badly. We didn't want to tie him down to a longer contract and we didn't value him as a player.

    we tied him down to a five year contract two years ago. we had more urgent things to deal with this summer then some **** who wants more money. how can you moan about the club not tieing plaeyrs down when they had given a player a five year contract and he wanted a new one a year into it when his agent fucked up

  9. #9
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    16,548
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by ollie the optimist View Post
    we tied him down to a five year contract two years ago. we had more urgent things to deal with this summer then some **** who wants more money. how can you moan about the club not tieing plaeyrs down when they had given a player a five year contract and he wanted a new one a year into it when his agent fucked up
    Urgent things...what you mean like selling of two of our first teamers?

    Fact is if we want to hold onto players we need to start contract talks early, experience should tell us that. Start with a year or two left and you're already in trouble....those are the hard facts.

    If we want to keep hold of players we should be negotiating with them with 2 to 3 years left on their contracts to make sure we don't lose them.

    Had we done with others, we'd have a) got a lot more money or b) not sold them.

    This summer really takes the biscuit for me, it appears on the face of it that they planned to make a few signings to make sure season tickets etc are sold, once done they sell off two players and make sure we make a tidy profit. F*cking sickening to be honest.
    Last edited by Özim; 07-09-2012 at 12:23 PM.

  10. #10
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    286
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I agree with your last bit. Im as sickened as you by the way the board has operated over the last couple of years in particular; however, to be fair, if he has three years left on a five year contract, I dont believe that the board should have to start negotiating with him. Its ridiculous
    Quote Originally Posted by ItsMe View Post
    Urgent things...what you mean like selling of two of our first teamers?

    Fact is if we want to hold onto players we need to start contract talks early, experience should tell us that. Start with a year or two left and you're already in trouble....those are the hard facts.

    If we want to keep hold of players we should be negotiating with them with 2 to 3 years left on their contracts to make sure we don't lose them.

    Had we done with others, we'd have a) got a lot more money or b) not sold them.

    This summer really takes the biscuit for me, it appears on the face of it that they planned to make a few signings to make sure season tickets etc are sold, once done they sell off two players and make sure we make a tidy profit. F*cking sickening to be honest.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •