What now for Walcott?

[milla]

Im sue there are other things other than money to sort out as well

Probably his signing bonus

[Cripps_orig]

Probably his signing bonus

Im sure that would be money related

[Shaqiri Is Boss]

We'll gladly take him off your hands for 8 whole pounds.

And I'll throw in a free medallion.

[Cripps_orig]

We'll gladly take him off your hands for 8 whole pounds.

And I'll throw in a free medallion.

Do you really want someone who isnt brilliant in every game he plays and therefore must be shit?

[Niall_Quinn]

Was he ordinary when he was taking apart your beloved Cole and Terry last season?

Yes, you were just talking about making up shit. When my avatar was Terry getting kicked in the head (because I hate the ****) and a common search will reveal ****ly Cole or Cashley (because I hate the ****) attached to my username maybe a thousand times, we can easily determine who is making shit up.

Fair enough?

I've read the match threads on GW and seen everyone saying, Cazorla, what a great performance. For every game. So let's not pretend natural talent doesn't show. If you can't see a big difference between players with genuine class and Theo Walcott then no wonder you are satisfied with his output. You seem to be praising Walcott for being less wasteful than Gervinho. How many shit balls did they play? How many fucked up first touches? How many anonymous stints? I'm just wondering what might happen if you put a genuine £100K per week player on the pitch. We could win something maybe.

I haven't been brainwashed by anyone. I want players who can pass, shoot and have a bit of intelligence on the ball. That's not Theo. Nothing to do with what the media think. Yeah, for 100K A FUCKING WEEK I want a superstar, not Theo Walcott. What's wrong with that? What's dumb about that? Paying the **** would be dumb.

[Niall_Quinn]

The guy who has scored as many as Theo this season and has played much more?

Are you saying Theo is in the same class as this guy? Really?

[Cripps_orig]

I haven't been brainwashed by anyone.

Of course not

[Cripps_orig]

Are you saying Theo is in the same class as this guy? Really?

Cazorla is better on the ball.

In terms of end product? Its there for all to see

[milla]

Yes, you were just talking about making up shit. When my avatar was Terry getting kicked in the head (because I hate the ****) and a common search will reveal ****ly Cole or Cashley (because I hate the ****) attached to my username maybe a thousand times, we can easily determine who is making shit up.

Fair enough?

I've read the match threads on GW and seen everyone saying, Cazorla, what a great performance. For every game. So let's not pretend natural talent doesn't show. If you can't see a big difference between players with genuine class and Theo Walcott then no wonder you are satisfied with his output. You seem to be praising Walcott for being less wasteful than Gervinho. How many shit balls did they play? How many fucked up first touches? How many anonymous stints? I'm just wondering what might happen if you put a genuine £100K per week player on the pitch. We could win something maybe.

I haven't been brainwashed by anyone. I want players who can pass, shoot and have a bit of intelligence on the ball. That's not Theo. Nothing to do with what the media think. Yeah, for 100K A FUCKING WEEK I want a superstar, not Theo Walcott. What's wrong with that? What's dumb about that? Paying the **** would be dumb.

Pretty much my sentiment IMO. He may sell more shirts than others, but 70-80k (holy shit, that's a lot money!!!) should be his ceiling. Unless he starts banging 20-30 goals from the wing, I can't see Wenger giving in to Feo.

[Olivier's xmas twist]

Yes, you were just talking about making up shit. When my avatar was Terry getting kicked in the head (because I hate the ****) and a common search will reveal ****ly Cole or Cashley (because I hate the ****) attached to my username maybe a thousand times, we can easily determine who is making shit up.

Fair enough?

I've read the match threads on GW and seen everyone saying, Cazorla, what a great performance. For every game. So let's not pretend natural talent doesn't show. If you can't see a big difference between players with genuine class and Theo Walcott then no wonder you are satisfied with his output. You seem to be praising Walcott for being less wasteful than Gervinho. How many shit balls did they play? How many fucked up first touches? How many anonymous stints? I'm just wondering what might happen if you put a genuine £100K per week player on the pitch. We could win something maybe.

I haven't been brainwashed by anyone. I want players who can pass, shoot and have a bit of intelligence on the ball. That's not Theo. Nothing to do with what the media think. Yeah, for 100K A FUCKING WEEK I want a superstar, not Theo Walcott. What's wrong with that? What's dumb about that? Paying the **** would be dumb.

NQ