Never really rated Aguero tbh
Still, City needed someone and went out and got him.
Whereas we need someone, we are waiting for him to be born and then get him 16 years later.
In short, we're fucked
Never really rated Aguero tbh
Still, City needed someone and went out and got him.
Whereas we need someone, we are waiting for him to be born and then get him 16 years later.
In short, we're fucked
You Weren't saying that last week lol going on about how we should have goen in for him etc but i do agree with your posts.Originally Posted by Ach
It was more the "why arent we going after whos available?" rather than "Why arent we going after Aguero?"
I think he's pretty good. Consistently manages to score 20+ for a team that doesn't set the world alight. Better record than Torres in Spain I think as well.
Not saying he's going to reach Ronaldo and Henry esque stardom, but City have got themselves a quality player none the less.
Harsh on Torres tbh. Back when he was at Atletico, they were arguably the Blackburn/Bolton/Stoke etc of Spain. Rarely attacked and only played one up front so Torres only ever got 10-15 a season which for a team like that is pretty good.
Its only since he left and they used the money they got for him to get better offensive players and expand their play.
As for Aguero, yeah he scores goals but my anti Argentine biasedness says hes overated so he must be. Saying that, prefer him over the "best player in the world" over at Cuntlona
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote