User Tag List

Page 16 of 29 FirstFirst ... 6141516171826 ... LastLast
Results 151 to 160 of 281

Thread: Match Reaction v Bradford

  1. #151
    Pat Rice LDG's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    17,723
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    We were all over 'em once Ramsey went off. Rosicky changed the pace of it.

    But there is being the better team, and being only slightly better than a team from the 4th division. And that is why, over all, we are utter turd.
    It's better to burn out, than to fade away.

  2. #152
    Administrator Letters's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    40,497
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Gervinho's Forehead View Post
    I know! "We were by far the better team"

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/m...ford-v-arsenal


  3. #153
    Member Gervinho's Forehead's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    2,472
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Meh-ry Christmas View Post
    “Oh, people can come up with statistics to prove anything. 14% of people know that.”

  4. #154
    bye Xhaka Can’t's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Here
    Posts
    15,302
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by yorkshire-gooner View Post
    Got frostbite for the privilege of watching that! One positive from the night was our fans, great atmosphere. Seemed that there were only 3 players trying to get the team going, Wilshere, Gibbs and Coq! Coq was IMO our best player in the first half, but that didn't take much. All in all, I'm off to bed to try warm up and get some feeling into my toes!!
    You did us proud last night.

    Sent from my HTC One S using Tapatalk 2
    If you don’t send this signature to ten people, you will become a Spurs fan.

  5. #155
    Member Kano's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    10,319
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Meh-ry Christmas View Post
    mate, when it takes 69min for us to muster a shot on target, we can't drag out stats when they are trying to hang onto a lead.

    we were fucking atrocious and cannot take any high ground by saying we were 'better'. in no way were we better. we lost to a division 2 side. not through bad luck or anything else. but because we were shit.

  6. #156
    Administrator Letters's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    40,497
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Gervinho's Forehead View Post
    “Oh, people can come up with statistics to prove anything. 14% of people know that.”
    What LDG said. Certainly towards the end and throughout extra time we were by far the better side.
    But 34 goal attempts and only 6 on target

    Bradford were up for it. Jack aside, we weren't.

  7. #157
    Pat Rice LDG's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    17,723
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Meh-ry Christmas View Post
    You can't prove anything with stats

    Do people actually watch football anymore?? We were clearly the better team, but that doesn't make up for the standard of our football, or what you would expect from a premiership team, against a bunch of cloggers.
    It's better to burn out, than to fade away.

  8. #158
    Administrator Letters's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    40,497
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Terry Tuffnutz View Post
    we were fucking atrocious and cannot take any high ground by saying we were 'better'. in no way were we better.
    We were better.

    We lost because they wanted it more. Our players were technically better but a cold night up north against a side who are up for it, we're just not bothered enough. That is what is unforgivable.

  9. #159
    Member Kano's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    10,319
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    the game lasted 120 minutes. for 70 of them, they stopped us from getting a shot on target. that is more than half the game. it doesn't tell me we were better. it's embarrassing tbh.

    also, just saw this depressing stat of our record so far this season, 10 wins from 25 games:

    DDWWWDWLWWLLWDLDDWWDDLLW


    what makes it worse is hearing liverpool twats piping up this morning.

  10. #160
    Pat Rice LDG's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    17,723
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    We got in behind them on the flanks so many times it was untrue.

    If we had someone who could cross a ball (not Ramsey or Gervinho), and someone who could put them away (not Gervinho or Chamahk) then we would have won by a cricket score.

    The midfield bossed the middle of the park, I thought Gibbs was fine, Sagna was fine, Vermaelen was just Vermaelen (a shadow of what he was last year), and Chesney was not really tested too much throughout.

    We controlled most of the match, but like Letters said, we didn't want it enough, and we lacked quality up top and on the wing.

    And as everyone, bar Wenger seems to understand. RAMSEY IS SHIT. GERVINHO IS SHIT. CHAMAHK IS SHIT. And that is why we lost.
    It's better to burn out, than to fade away.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •