Next Arsenal manager?

[Power n Glory]

villa just wasted money and created their own problems. they were top 5, spending shedloads and then fucked it all up. everton stay top 7, no lower and fulham hit top ten, mid table on a lot less money than Stoke have spent - they got to a euro final ffs! Sunderland have thrown a lot of money at things too but changed managers too often. bolton achieved better when with a fixed manager, like stoke have now. newcastle? well, they're just a joke, we all know that. Stoke? A healthy amount of cash, stable crowds and the same manager. No excuse for the same old shit.

No one is expecting them to have achieved it by now but to be making steps towards that. and they're not. which is why even stoke fans are getting tired of it.

anyway, this isn't wearestoke****s.com so that's enough of that on this.

they are also orcish ****s, so that is enough to prove my point.

They’re still pretty new to the Prem in comparison to other teams. Fulham have been around in the league a lot longer, since 2001, over 10 years. They were outside of the top 10 for years before having that good run with Roy in the Europa League. The Stoke fans maybe pissed and Pulis doesn’t play pretty football but when you look around the league, some big clubs have gone down and struggled to make it back. In the 5/6 years Stoke have been in the league, I wouldn’t expect them to make swooping changes over night. There are many teams that come up and go back down quickly.

[Özil's Panoramic View]

Can we end this back and forth squabble by saying we don't want Moyes as Lord Goon's replacement.

He's won fuck all for 11 consecutive seasons, a feat Wenger is fast emulating.

Swopping a winner turned loser for a life long loser would be bloody scandalous.

No fucking thanks.

[Power n Glory]

Can we end this back and forth squabble by saying we don't want Moyes as Lord Goon's replacement.

He's won fuck all for 11 consecutive seasons, a feat Wenger is fast emulating.

Swopping a winner turned loser for a life long loser would be bloody scandalous.

No fucking thanks.

[Kano]

They’re still pretty new to the Prem in comparison to other teams. Fulham have been around in the league a lot longer, since 2001, over 10 years. They were outside of the top 10 for years before having that good run with Roy in the Europa League. The Stoke fans maybe pissed and Pulis doesn’t play pretty football but when you look around the league, some big clubs have gone down and struggled to make it back. In the 5/6 years Stoke have been in the league, I wouldn’t expect them to make swooping changes over night. There are many teams that come up and go back down quickly.

pretty football argument isn't on the table, that's a lazy go to answer. no one is expecting sweeping changes overnight. all the things i've written in the posts you've supposedly read.

the more i write about stoke, the dirtier I feel. fuck this.

plus, stoke are ****s.

[Kano]

Can we end this back and forth squabble by saying we don't want Moyes as Lord Goon's replacement.

He's won fuck all for 11 consecutive seasons, a feat Wenger is fast emulating.

Swopping a winner turned loser for a life long loser would be bloody scandalous.

No fucking thanks.

if wenger left this summer, moyes would be in the frame. absolutely guaranteed.

[Power n Glory]

pretty football argument isn't on the table, that's a lazy go to answer. no one is expecting sweeping changes overnight. all the things i've written in the posts you've supposedly read.

the more i write about stoke, the dirtier I feel. fuck this.

plus, stoke are ****s.

I'd be more inclined to argue that they could play a prettier and more technical game or that's what they should aspire to. I can't see how they'd expect to rise so quickly in the ranks or win honours when so many other well established teams haven't managed to.

[Özil's Panoramic View]

pretty football argument isn't on the table, that's a lazy go to answer. no one is expecting sweeping changes overnight. all the things i've written in the posts you've supposedly read.

the more i write about stoke, the dirtier I feel. fuck this.

plus, stoke are ****s.

Took you long enough to realise the toxic effects of going on about those obnoxious inbred ****s.

Hope this is well and truly the cessation of any mention of those vermins on here unless they are an upcoming fixture and we're rightly dogging those orc bastards.

[Özil's Panoramic View]

if wenger left this summer, moyes would be in the frame. absolutely guaranteed.

You are really in a mean mood today, right.

Fuck's up with these cringeworthy posts?

[She Wore A Yellow Ribbon]

There is no need to explain because I get your argument but you keep failing to understand that there are clubs just as small as Everton working on restrained budgets that manage to pull punch above their weight and win trophies. I’ve always said the English mid table teams are pretty poor when you compare them to the Spanish teams like Sevilla and Athletico. There aren’t many English clubs that win the Europa league or put on a performance. Everton have qualified for the comp on a number of occasions and have never done well.

I don’t watch every league but have seen enough league/international, champs league and Europa league games to see when a team can play ball but my knowledge is limited and I’m pretty sure other posters can add their piece with other suggestions. With so many other strong teams out there I’ve got to ask why Moyes and is it just because you mainly watch English football? Isn’t it a concern that he’s never won a domestic trophy or had a good run in Europe when pitted against equal teams?

can you name me a couple of clubs "just as small as everton who are on a restrained budget yet manage to pull above their weight and win trophies" then? and by that i mean win trophies and stay consistent, not get relegated 6 months later. cause once again, im finding it hard to think of many. i think its just a fantasised statement to back your argument up; a pipeline dream rebelling the actualities of football. which teams have exactly pushed on from being a load of crap, which everton admittedly were, to winning trophies and being decent? even we cant be classified as being in that category cause we were successful and a big club before wenger was here.

moyes isnt my first choice, i think everyone knows its always been klopp but i just find it bizarre you disregard him and seem to belittle his achievements when logic suggests he's a perfectly able manager to take over the helm from wenger. i guess im sticking up for moyes because i think he's a realistic candidate more than anything. in our discussions we've got to remain level headed, we wont be going for anyone flashy or someone outspoken, we wont be going for anyone who defies the boards culture and we wont be going for someone who is elite. i think we all know that. i want klopp here but when i take a step back, deep down i know it probably wont happen. i post it in threads as an attempt to have a dig at wenger but its just a dream; with every season that passes his stock is getting higher and the board will go for a complete tangent as usual.

so when you look at the next tier of managers available i think moyes is a pretty credible candidate, and the reasons why was explained in our early interactions. is it a concern he's never won a trophy? of course. but it was a concern when i picked up the paper on the morning of the 30th september 1996 and saw someone called 'arsene wenger' taking charge of my football club! someone who id never heard of before! look how that turned out.

[She Wore A Yellow Ribbon]

pretty football argument isn't on the table, that's a lazy go to answer. no one is expecting sweeping changes overnight. all the things i've written in the posts you've supposedly read.

the more i write about stoke, the dirtier I feel. fuck this.

plus, stoke are ****s.

how is the word c*nt banned on here but stoke is freely allowed?

letters