
Originally Posted by
Letters (TPFKA WWTL@WHL)
He should have been sacked for the collapse at the end of last season.
No. I said he should have been sacked for the end of last season. I'll keep repeating that if you like.
Again, HE SHOULD HAVE BEEN SACKED FOR THE END OF LAST SEASON. Is that clear enough?
But I don't believe that the mess in the transfer market this summer is ALL his doing.
I don't believe that someone new will come in and we will inevitably do better or start throwing money around because I think there are other things going wrong that changing manager won't fix.
That's where I'm conflicted. There are some reasons why I think he should be sacked, other reasons why I'm not sure that changing manager would fix all our problems and might actually make things worse. And please don't say "how could it be worse?" We're going to be in a real battle for top 4 this year but not in a relegation battle.
It sounds like you don't understand my position at all. You seem to think that just because I think he should have been sacked for the collapse last season that means I can't defend him at all. I'll defend him against people who I think are overly disrespectful or criticise EVERYTHING he does or says.