User Tag List

Page 14 of 20 FirstFirst ... 41213141516 ... LastLast
Results 131 to 140 of 192

Thread: If Nasri and Cesc Leave

  1. #131
    King Kong Boss's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    2,252
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Letters (TPFKA WWTL@WHL) View Post
    There is absolutely nothing ambitious about throwing silly amounts of money around.
    It's ambitious to try and do things the hard way, not turn the Football Manager Infinite Money cheat on (which is effectively what they're doing).
    Ambition: desire and determination to achieve success
    The dictionary seems to disagree with you.

    The King Is Back.

  2. #132
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    734
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Yeah, going by that definition, every single team in the Premiership is showing exactly the same amount of ambition, it's not the best word to use at all, it's just a buzz word thrown out there to criticise anyone not doing what someone else thinks is best.

    Whatever Citeh are doing is different to what we're doing but it all has the same aim in mind, winning trophies.

  3. #133
    King Kong Boss's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    2,252
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Change 'success' to 'trophies' and it's spot on.

    And let's not try and pretend that we're matching our ambition to win trophies with the same actions that Citeh are taking (admittedly in some part due to a restriction, finance).

    Let's stop being pedantic and look at how it's no coincidence that our top players want a change in the steps Wenger takes to try and win trophies (namely adding more quality).

    Citeh are doing that, don't think most top players care 'how'.

    The King Is Back.

  4. #134
    Tennis Expert Syn's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    London
    Posts
    10,502
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Oh fuck, we're going to get into a philosophical debate about what 'success' is, aren't we? (no, it's not just trophies you glory-cunting muppets); that said, doing things the hard way isn't necessarily ambitious if there is an easier path open...artificially making things hard is just stupid, not ambitious. Arsenal at the moment are stupid. And so is all your faces.

  5. #135
    Administrator Letters's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    41,158
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Syn View Post
    Oh fuck, we're going to get into a philosophical debate about what 'success' is, aren't we? (no, it's not just trophies you glory-cunting muppets); that said, doing things the hard way isn't necessarily ambitious if there is an easier path open...artificially making things hard is just stupid, not ambitious. Arsenal at the moment are stupid. And so is all your faces.
    So are all our faces.

  6. #136
    Administrator Letters's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    41,158
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Boss View Post
    The dictionary seems to disagree with you.
    OK. So if, to run with Niall Quinn's post, I want to try to climb a mountain and I get a helicoptor to drop me at the top then I'm being really ambitious and I've achieved 'success'.

    If you say so.

  7. #137
    Member Ironing's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    311
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    So you're saying Nasri should be just as happy to lose / underachieve with Arsenal (and our mediocre squad-players who can barely control/pass/finish), than win with City (and their array of superstars)? What loyalty should he have to the club? He's a french kid and only been here 3 years.

    Don't forget to factor in that as a club we haven't been "trying our best" to compete - for the past 6 years we've been doing the bare minimum in terms of improving the squad to compete for titles, given our resources. We are top of the chart for net transfer spend!

    Meaning, with a bit more investment over the years and better decision making on playing staff, we could have easily been more competitive over this period. It's not the case that we've tried our best and failed. We HAVEN'T tried our best, and failed as a result. This is why the fans are frustrated, and why shouldn't the players be too?

  8. #138
    King Kong Boss's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    2,252
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Letters (TPFKA WWTL@WHL) View Post
    OK. So if, to run with Niall Quinn's post, I want to try to climb a mountain and I get a helicoptor to drop me at the top then I'm being really ambitious and I've achieved 'success'.

    If you say so.
    If money guaranteed success (reaching the top) you'd be right.

    Have Man City won the league? Have Chelsea won the Champions League yet? Have Real Madrid won the league / CL in the last few years?

    Have ADUG tried to take a team that regularly finished 15th and tried to make them into world champions? Yes.

    The fastest way to compete with the top is money, you complain that the league is predictable and then complain when someone does what's required to compete?

    The King Is Back.

  9. #139
    Administrator Letters's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    41,158
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Boss View Post
    If money guaranteed success (reaching the top) you'd be right.

    Have Man City won the league?
    No, but give it time, they've only just started. It took Chelsea a few years too and they started higher than City were.
    But they've won the FA Cup already for the first time in your life, possibly the first time in mine.
    Co-incidence? You decide.
    Chelsea hadn't won the league in my lifetime till Uncle Abramovic came along.

    The fastest way to compete with the top is money, you complain that the league is predictable and then complain when someone does what's required to compete?
    Yes, because football is a sport, not a business. It shouldn't just be about who has the most money and it increasingly is.
    It's not City's fault that it's that way and yes, they're taking the quick way, possibly the only way, to success. But don't expect me happy about what they're doing or the state of football these days which allows them to do it.

  10. #140
    Member Ironing's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    311
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Letters (TPFKA WWTL@WHL) View Post
    OK. So if, to run with Niall Quinn's post, I want to try to climb a mountain and I get a helicoptor to drop me at the top then I'm being really ambitious and I've achieved 'success'.

    If you say so.
    Dumb analogy. The success of the team is based on... the whole team. Climbing a mountain is down to one person. Nasri can't be responsible for how arsenal have underachieved as a team, and he can't make them win on his own.

    He's already climbed his own 'mountain' - he's highly paid and at a club where he at least has a CHANCE of winning something

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •