User Tag List

Page 10 of 12 FirstFirst ... 89101112 LastLast
Results 91 to 100 of 115

Thread: Is There Corruption By Match Officials In The Premier League

  1. #91
    They/Them GP's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    29,279
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Letters View Post
    Are "there's no corruption" and "the refs and media are always anti-Arsenal" the only two options?
    Who's said they're anti-Arsenal.

    Only you've said that.
    NOTE: The location of this post has been moved and the thread title (which was previously Wenger is Leaving) has been manipulated by a notorious pro-Wenger moderator. What was previously a message that contained no profanity and made a comment on a real life event has now been manipulated by a deliberately provocative title. An old and crude propaganda and censorship technique.


  2. #92
    Member IBK's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Highgate, London
    Posts
    4,129
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Corruption's not the same thing as weakness and bias, so no.
    Putting the laughter back into manslaughter

  3. #93
    Selling optimism to fools KSE Comedy Club's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    5,304
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Also, why do we never hear talk of officials in other sports (that use technology to help make their decisions) getting things wrong on a regular basis?

    Are tennis matches talked about because of how well the competitors played or about how the umpire called a game wrong?

    Rugby?
    Cricket?

    Yes sometimes, there have been cases where a player might question a decision, but after a replay or technological evidence is used, the matter is cleared up instantly one way or another. But accurately and most importantly, correctly.

    You cannot say the same about football.

  4. #94
    Selling optimism to fools KSE Comedy Club's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    5,304
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by IBK View Post
    Corruption's not the same thing as weakness and bias, so no.
    Weakness, no I agree.

    But bias?

    Of course it is. Not necessarily for financial gain but in some sense it is still corruption.

  5. #95
    ***** Niall_Quinn's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    69,086
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by IBK View Post
    Corruption's not the same thing as weakness and bias, so no.
    Weakness is often a symptom of corruption and bias is one of the purest forms of corruption because you don't even need to be paid to undermine a system or principle.
    Für eure Sicherheit

  6. #96
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    16,548
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Jeebus View Post
    Also, why do we never hear talk of officials in other sports (that use technology to help make their decisions) getting things wrong on a regular basis?

    Are tennis matches talked about because of how well the competitors played or about how the umpire called a game wrong?

    Rugby?
    Cricket?

    Yes sometimes, there have been cases where a player might question a decision, but after a replay or technological evidence is used, the matter is cleared up instantly one way or another. But accurately and most importantly, correctly.

    You cannot say the same about football.
    You only get 3 challenges a set in tennis, so yes there's plenty of mistakes, people don't go on about it because unlike football fans they don't believe corruption exists.

    Again with Cricket they have limited use of technology and there's plenty of mistakes and there's been corruption in Cricket yet people don't point the finger at official calling them corrupt.

  7. #97
    Selling optimism to fools KSE Comedy Club's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    5,304
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    NQ said it better than me

  8. #98
    Selling optimism to fools KSE Comedy Club's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    5,304
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Özim View Post
    You only get 3 challenges a set in tennis, so yes there's plenty of mistakes, people don't go on about it because unlike football fans they don't believe corruption exists.

    Again with Cricket they have limited use of technology and there's plenty of mistakes and there's been corruption in Cricket yet people don't point the finger at official calling them corrupt.
    Of course there are.

    That's all I ever hear from tennis, cricket and rugby fans. Every game it's the same thing 'the umpires/refs are shite', 'that was never a.....' etc, etc.


  9. #99
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    16,548
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Jeebus View Post
    Of course there are.

    That's all I ever hear from tennis, cricket and rugby fans. Every game it's the same thing 'the umpires/refs are shite', 'that was never a.....' etc, etc.

    That's nonsense sorry, I watch a lot of tennis and noone ever claims the officials are corrupt (well other than Jeff Tarango when he wasn't happy about a decision).

    Fans seem obsessed with it in football, I guess football fans like to play the victims more than tennis fans, if it doesn't go your way it's because the officials are corrupt or biased against you.

  10. #100
    Selling optimism to fools KSE Comedy Club's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    5,304
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Özim View Post
    That's nonsense sorry, I watch a lot of tennis and noone ever claims the officials are corrupt (well other than Jeff Tarango when he wasn't happy about a decision).

    Fans seem obsessed with it in football, I guess football fans like to play the victims more than tennis fans.
    I was being sarcastic.

    The reason fans don't call them corrupt is because mistakes are few and far between. There are some yes, but they don't happen with the frequent regularity that they do in football.

    There's also only so much they can get wrong in sports where technology is used to its full extent.

    There is fuck all in football, and so we just have to trust in shit like 'the refs interpretation' and 'judgement'.

    You know, the same sort of amateur crap that used to happen in playground football.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •