I don't think the big money clubs will have any problem signing him if he's available they can afford it.Originally Posted by Niall_Quinn
I don't think the big money clubs will have any problem signing him if he's available they can afford it.
You wont like him when he`s angry
You think, you don't think it's actually common sense to want to see the host nation remain in the tournament?
If they go out the country loses interest and it ruins the atmosphere and World Cup somewhat, the best tournaments always have the hosts doing well.
In my eyes Brazil is the home of football and my second favourite team behind France.
He's not the only shit in that Brazil team and as bad as he is he's far from the worst. Don't know what the hell that Fred thing is supposed to be and somehow they've found a player almost as bad in Jo. Add the chav pubbers on top and it all adds up to a disgrace to the shirt.
Für eure Sicherheit
I don't think Brazil can beat Colombia and France or Germany so they'll need it to fall their way I think.
Don't want them to win the thing, the weakest Brazil side in a World Cup since 1990 for me plus too many Chelsea players.
I'd like to see Colombia smash them in the quarters but they can't defend for shit
Genuinely gutted for Chile
I live in England not South America the atmosphere in the stadiums is peripheral to me
If we were talking about Brazil side who played under Tele Santana I might care, but for me it's like Chelsea + Neymar
Brazil.
Chile.
It's just the general atmosphere around the tournament, hosts going out usually means a less interesting and supported tournament. The home support is important, after all they make up the majority of the fans at that World cup.
I don't think that's true with the other South American sides there too, at least not from what I have seen. Colombia and Argentina have been massively supported.
Hated in Argentina's case by the Brazilian fans that are in the stadium at the time.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote