Which one? Probably though, most of the posts on here are.Originally Posted by Jeebus
Letters, isn't that your post from 2-3 years ago??
The endless Groundhog Day is one of the frustrations of most Arsenal fans, even mediocre ones.
Which one? Probably though, most of the posts on here are.Letters, isn't that your post from 2-3 years ago??
The endless Groundhog Day is one of the frustrations of most Arsenal fans, even mediocre ones.
Liverpool, Everton & the Spuds haven't moved to a bigger stadium & still compete for top 4. What makes you think we couldn't had we stayed at Highbury.Financial fair play
Yeah. City really came a cropper when they fell foul of that rule.
And what City and Chelsea do is buy players and then loan them out so competing clubs can't have them. In City's case the owners have bought other clubs to stockpile players.
Whatever you think about the move from Highbury there's no way we'd be anywhere near the top 4 had we not moved. And no manager is getting sacked having just won a major trophy and finished with the most points for 6 years.
Is this a serious post?
None of those teams are consistent top 4 teams. Liverpool fell off a cliff and Spurs have only made CL once.
The stadium was imperative.
As for the Wumget, he is finished tactically and dont even know it. He is done, imo but no one is going to tell him he is done at the club so we are stuck.
Innit. And two of those clubs are looking to move because of the revenue it will generate.
all three clubs are moving or increasing capacity at their stadiums. they sorted of competed for 4th place but due to our bigger resources and stability they haven't generally managed it.
we have been consistent but have never overachieved since the emergence of City and the Chavs. We are consistently top 4 but so is our wage bill and that's a better indicator than transfer spend alone.
Anyway Wenger is here for next 3 years, we will finish top 4 each year and that's about it.
The advantages of moving to a bigger stadium, with bigger revenue means we increase our finances - it doesn't mean success on the field as we've seen because we don't spend to strengthen where needed. If these increased finances were being used in the correct way to build a squad to compete at top level then there wouldn't be many anti-Wenger posters on here. To start this season with extremelly weak defensive cover, no decent DM & Giroud as the only recognized CF, we could have had this staying at Highbury. Wenger is not using the advantage the stadium move has given us, we will be further away than ever this year in Europe & already struggling to beat pub teams in the league with the boring, sideways passing football that we play.
To make use of our new found financial windfall, we need a different approach from someone who recognizes what it takes to compete - Wenger cannot compete tactically these days, especially against top teams & his idea of a strong squad is simply pathetic.
Spot on
I think all 3 clubs are looking to move for revenue reasons but will they do it & be a less competitive team 10 years later?
Brilliant.
Despite this being thoroughly debunked 4 posts up, just take the one post on the page that you agree with and go with it, adding another brick to the castle that is Wenger out movement on GW.
Regardless of facts. Regardless of arguments. Wenger out because Wenger out.
Just perfect.
You used to be everything to me
Now you're tired of fighting
This.
Society is now one polished horde
Formed by two mighty tribes, the bores and the bored.
"After all, it was the Gunners’ goalkeeper who started the move that culminated in Thomas’ crowning glory. It was Lukic who, in injury time, decided to throw the ball out to Lee Dixon rather than lump it long..."
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote