Wenger Referendum: Yes Or No

[LDG]

Wenger has consistently delivered C.L. football by finishing in the top 4. He has done this without the spending power of the Chavs or Gypos whilst still competing with a strong Utd side under Fergie. This is fact & can only be admired.
However, Wenger & Danny Fitz sold us the Emirates dream which funnily enough didn't mention a struggle for top 4 every year.
The stadium move hasn't cost us every year, it hasn't left a deficit - the extra revenue easily exceeds the stadium repayments so maybe even they didn't expect a fight for 4th every year.
But over a decade later, we have won the FA cup once , we have a team that doesn't compete in the EPL or the C.L. anymore, our football style hasn't progressed & due to the players we have it can't, we struggle to get 4th, we struggle to get out of C.L group stages ( this year a Demba Ba header away from even qualifying ), total lack of squad depth defensively, lack of quality in 3 main positions in our starting 11 & a team regularly beaten by the teams who have progressed.
The stadium was supposed to take us to another level, Wenger can just about guarantee us 4th although its getting tighter every year but the above should prove that to match our new shiny, modern stadium - we need a new shiny, modern manager.

I'm not sure about the Spurs C.L. question under Wenger. I can see what you are saying but I think if we had replaced Wenger with a Guardiola or a Klopp 5 years ago - I think we'd be regularly fighting with the top teams for the title which would probably have meant it was only United that Spurs could overtake. The Invincible team came at the right time for Wenger, before money spoilt the game, but it was a team that he has failed to recreate & I doubt he would have any more success at doing that at Spurs.

Well, yes.

So we're all singing from the same hymn sheet then.

Wenger and co. should be admired for consistently delivering top four on a budget.

Wenger doesn't have what it takes to take it further, because of his tactical limitations, his gambling with the squad, and persistence with failed players/methods/style.

I don't see anyone who is arguing differently.

[Dein-machine]

Well, yes.

So we're all singing from the same hymn sheet then.

Wenger and co. should be admired for consistently delivering top four on a budget.

Wenger doesn't have what it takes to take it further, because of his tactical limitations, his gambling with the squad, and persistence with failed players/methods/style.

I don't see anyone who is arguing differently.

Well then I don't see why were arguing - the thread is Wenger YES or NO - we're both saying NO - YES!