
Originally Posted by
Letters
Yes, obviously I agree with that. I'm just going on a few people who commented on the signing at the time and seemed to think he's a good player. And being in the team of the year is a good indication that he's not a clogger. But no, he's not a household name. It's just funny to see Zim floundering around changing his argument so that his opinion can stay the same. He does this all the time. It is textbook cognitive dissonance. He takes a position and the more evidence he's shown that he's wrong the more he digs his heels in, moves goalposts and does logical contortions to do anything other than change his position an inch. He's helped by a lot of things in football being quite subjective of course.
GP said that ages ago, at the time I think his point was "so far, so good" and I generally agreed that it was quite promising we had signed two good players reasonably early in the window. I don't think his argument was about money spent but about getting some business done fairly early and not having deadline day sagas. But we've moved on a bit since then and not continued to sign the players we need, as time goes on the summer looks less and less impressive.
I don't know whether we would have signed Kolasanic were he not free, I was just merely pointing out it's logically flawed to discount a signing because it was a free, with the Bosman ruling players can run down their contracts and go on free transfers and he's not some kid who is being let go. Judging the Kolasanic signing just on the basis that he was free is as flawed as thinking Kyle Walker is a megastar because he cost £50m.
I agree we have a lot of work to do. But there is an argument that says that while Wenger is manager it doesn't matter much who we sign anyway.