Quote Originally Posted by Blink 1nce Quince 2wice View Post
Pochettino won't have missed the fact we've signed an Olympic athlete and with his rep for attention to detail he will know the more they push forward the more exposed they will be at the back and that might even play into our hands.

I can't even remember what Monreal was like against City....but that is 1 game against possibly the best side the prem has seen a few months ago. Anybody else you've named in your back 4 is just as likely and in most cases more likely to cost us the game with a mistake than Monreal.

We've given up more goals through errant passes, poor positioning, awareness and sheer lethargy than lack of pace from any individual so I think you are placing too much consideration on that anyway.

I also think with that team and formation we are going to get outnumbered in midfield and allow Spurs to control the game. If they control the game they will feed Kane multiple times. If they feed Kane through multiple times he will definitely score. If we were a highly disciplined, drilled counter attacking team like Leicester were when they won the title I'd name a very similar team and formation to the one you have but not in our actual circumstances now.


The team you’d pick is even less defensively disciplined than mine

Putting Mkytarian at wing back....he’s a purely creative player. He won’t want to track back

Plus why should I trust your judgement on defensive positioning when you can’t remember a game from three months ago. Sterling is no more technically accomplished than anyone in the Spurs lineup and Monreal had a nightmare against him, whether we think Sterling dived for the penalty or not (I think Monreal was clumsy and played into Sterling’s hands to go over easy) he was given a torrid time.

The counter attack won’t work against Spurs. Because we have no one who can hold the ball up. So we have to do what we did at the Emirates and press them on the ball but that requires speed and agility in defensive areas to mop up if we lose possession in the first place