I don't want anything. You seemed to be complaining about the thread title I chose and the fact the thread is under your name.
The latter I don't think I can do anything about, yours just happened to be the first post I moved.
The former I can if you want me to. Otherwise I'll leave it as is.
I hear you. I have always found the censorship tools on vBulletin to be clunky. They could do a better job of it.Originally Posted by Letters
Für eure Sicherheit
It's fun pretending not to know what censorship means, isn't it?
If you're good I'll let you start new threads about him in this section if it makes you feel warm and fuzzy.
He who shall not be named?It's fun pretending not to know what censorship means, isn't it?
If you're good I'll let you start new threads about him in this section if it makes you feel warm and fuzzy.
Multiple free speech zones out of the way of the main forum. Is this the bit where I thank you?
Für eure Sicherheit
It's fun pretending not to know what censorship means, isn't it?
If you're good I'll let you start new threads about him in this section if it makes you feel warm and fuzzy.
Oi, mediocre mod, well it's a start. Don't suppose you could open up a section on the forum where the Keyboard Anarchist can only post his conspiracy theory clap trap and hectoring rhetoric? That way the rest of us have a choice whether we wish to be educated on fake news, the Deep State and why the rise of Arsene Wenger is a harbinger of the Harrowing ...
1) I love you, Nozza
2) Sadly not. General Chat is a perfectly adequate place for rantings of all kinds by all people.
Oi mush. You have a choice anyway. Read it , don't read it.
Or better yet, ditch the drive by cunt routine and say something worthwhile yourself. When was the last time you managed it?
Für eure Sicherheit
He does regularly but he was heavily censored.
I think this thread is a bit embarrassing really, do we even need to continue to talk about the same thing? Don't you want to move on from talking about him?
The thread is totally embarrassing. But not for the reasons you are implying.
I get the mods stick together. But you know Letters fucked this one up big time.
How many weeks are we past a guy leaving who was here for 22 years? And the censored post was in the Wenger thread, which was open, not locked. And in response to a newspaper interview that Wenger gave. If there's a policy not to talk about Wenger any more then announce it and lock the relevant threads. Or are we supposed to be mind readers?
Do I want to move on from talking about Wenger because Letters gets bunched up about it? What do you think?
Für eure Sicherheit
Oi, geezer, twice on Friday with the wife. Look, I get your analysis of global events I am familiar with the thoughts of Baldelli, Proudhorn and Woodcock and understand the lengths controllers of capital will go to to protect their interests. You're clearly bright and well read, but dude try other styles of imparting your take on things or else get yourself a good editor...
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
