Wenger says we lacked a little bit expression in the final third.
What the fuck does that even mean?
Does it mean we lacked tactics against the best defence in the league? Whose fault is that then?
Wenger says we lacked a little bit expression in the final third.
What the fuck does that even mean?
Does it mean we lacked tactics against the best defence in the league? Whose fault is that then?
Für eure Sicherheit
Henry having a pop at Özil, not sure why.
Henry isn't holding back on what we need to do as a club.
Because his record against the top teams isn't fantastic and he said he could say the same about a lot of the players. Giroud is one example as Jamie is saying.
Ozil was ok today. Tidy and didn't really put a foot wrong. Chelsea are just difficult to play against. But we really do need someone to really have the game of their lives if we're going to beat Chelsea.
Why would he to be fair, on one hand he isn't bound to us by anything other than emotion and second of all he's a pundit for Sky therefore it's his job to eviscerate us.
Those of us with long memories can remember even in the unbeaten season, the constantly recycled phrase of "Arsenal don't like it up them" and Andy Gray trashing us for our lack of "headed goals" because he seemed to believe they were the only goals that had any merit because those were the kind he used to score. And then they re-write history by comparing us negatively to the Arsenal of back then which had strength and character (something they were quick to dismiss at the time).
To sum it up Fuck Sky Sports.
They're laying into Bif on Sky.
Nobody could have prospered being isolated like that. If you play in front of the best defence in the league then what does it matter who is playing up front?
They FIRST time we played in a way we could breach that defence was after we had taken Giroud off.
The pundits are too afraid to call Wenger out.
Für eure Sicherheit
I need a look at it again but I think the ball went behind Welbeck, but Ozil definitely should have scored it. He just needed to touch it and it was in. If you can't create chances you have to be clinical. I counted 3 half chances along with that full chance and we wasted all of them.
Just to correct Thierry, who is only doing what it takes to be a pundit - lying - Ozil was easily, easily, the best player on the pitch. It was Santi who didn't step up today. In the gypo match Santi was the key. Even though he was in that crazy role that only Wenger could dream up he was all over the place linking the play, chasing, winning the ball, making sure the play was constantly in the opponent half and they had no respite. He was mastered by Matic and Ramires today. No criticism intended because, fuck me isn't this obvious, Santi is not a combative central midfielder. That's the position we lack, somebody to compliment Wenger's lucky Coquelin find.
But this does mean Wenger has to make a choice. Ozil or Santi. Wenger will never make that choice, he'd rather shoehorn both. A manager with a sense of proper squad rotation could prosper in that situation. We have a daddy who wants to do the right thing by his kids.
Für eure Sicherheit
Q: What about Arsenal fans 'Boring, boring Chelsea' chants?
Mourinho: I think ten years without the title, that's boring'
https://twitter.com/SamWallaceIndy/s...83216620838912
cunt