Erm yes, they had a high-spending, hire-and-fire strategy but it was very firmly linked to success, as demonstrated by numerous cup, PL and CL winsOriginally Posted by HCZ_Reborn
Erm yes, they had a high-spending, hire-and-fire strategy but it was very firmly linked to success, as demonstrated by numerous cup, PL and CL wins
They were all over the place at times, despite the money they spent…they were never able to gain any kind of consistency. One season they’d finish champions the next mid table. As I say a hot mess
The only hot mess i can see is in your brain, if you think the positions you take make any sense you're sadly wrong
Your reply is amusing given you get so worked up when I apparently give you “abuse”.
No I don’t think Chelsea’s history is that of a good or sustainable way to run a football club, I don’t really get how that’s controversial. I want success of course but I don’t want to get through two or three coaches in a season and never be able to build on success because you might win a big trophy one season and then you’re being beaten at home by QPR the next (and that’s not just even a hypothetical that’s exactly what happened with Chelsea)
When they won things it wasn’t because they were working to a good model, it’s because they spent fuck loads of money.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote