[QUOTE=Mac76;4597255]But that’s not the Chelsea approach which has been chaotic and any success largely attributable to the money pumped in. If I recall Rioch was on a deal for one year that we were able to extend but we chose not to. This is I think because Dein wanted to bring in Wenger when Graham went but was vetoed by Hill Wood (knowing Hill Wood something like “bah what would a Frenchy know about the English game”)
You can be ruthless without running a circus. We aren’t going to go beserk in the transfer market in a way that’s going to make things remotely sustainable (especially taking into consideration the cost of firing managers making pay outs and bringing in someone else) also it tends to mean you’re not going to get the best quality of coaches in. Because any decent coach will want time
I think you can argue Arteta has taken us as far as he can and I’d have no objection to parting ways with him at the end of the season (barring either a collapse or a miraculous turnaround). I think whatever this process or plan we have in place, it should be robust enough to survive his departure. But I don’t want us to have a revolving door hiring policy.
I think actually someone needs to be identified who we believe can get us the bare minimum of the title in the next three seasons
Last edited by HCZ_Reborn; 08-11-2024 at 01:00 PM.
[QUOTE=HCZ_Reborn;4597256]honestly it's just "lalalalala" with you isn't it - I'm talking about Abramovic's Chelsea not the mess they are now
and again pumping loads of money in doesn't help on its own, as Chelsea and Man Ure have been in the last few years, spending loads and now and being mid-table
[QUOTE=Mac76;4597257]You’re the one making the argument here. I know full well what era of Chelsea you’re talking about.
I don’t think it’s a good or successful model of running a club, the only reason it remotely worked for them in terms of winning anything at all was the amount of money they pumped in. The reason it doesn’t work now is because you have an inflated transfer market which means now more than ever as you say spending money doesn’t guarantee success
I don’t think it’s a good way to run a club, and I don’t think it would work for us. Instead of trying to claim that I’m deliberately misunderstanding you, accept that people not agreeing with you is not the worst thing that will happen to you
Last edited by HCZ_Reborn; 08-11-2024 at 01:08 PM.
you are actually unbelievable. I’m actually for once trying to be reasonable rather than dismissive and insulting (which is more fun) but all you’re proving here is what I knew to begin with that everything you claim about me is mere projection. You literally can’t stand to be disagreed with. I don’t know if you think I’m disagreeing with you for the sake of it, No I don’t think Chelsea in the last twenty years has ever been a good model for sustainability at a football club.
I think the only success they’ve had has been down to money, and I don’t think Man United in the age of FFP in anyway disproves that. But guess what fella, you don’t have to agree. But the exasperation isn’t necessary…think of your blood pressure
Last edited by HCZ_Reborn; 08-11-2024 at 01:14 PM.
I'm just amazed you keep saying the thing about it only being about money when, for the third time, Man Ure and Chelsea, as well as others have showed just spending money isn't the answer unless it's used right and you have someone who can get the team to win