Quote Originally Posted by HCZ_Reborn View Post
If I’m being hugely generous I can understand the inverted full back role when you’re playing away at city or Liverpool etc. Basically it’s putting an extra man in midfield and means you have control of the game. It’s not something I especially buy into because what you gain in control you lose in attack, but I can understand it and it’s proven reasonably successful

Against most teams it’s utterly unnecessary.

RE Havertz, the one thing that fucks me off about Jesus is that he doesn’t show for the ball, I can forgive players missing chances if they are getting themselves in position. And for all Havertz’s running off the ball he’s always there on the end of chances even if he is fluffing them….which seems to me more about confidence than exhaustion
Probably confidence AND exhaustion. The focus is on him fluffing his lines up front, but he covers a serious amount of ground over 90 minutes. You put Cunha in there and see what happens.