I try to be as objective as I can when it comes to seeing things too much in red and white, and am perhaps naturally inclined not to moan too much about decisions that we can't do anything about. But even so, there does seem to be an anti Arsenal agenda when it comes to PGML and many of the top 'pundits'. Maybe its not even the decisions against us in themselves, but certainly the lack of equivalence when it comes to other teams, including the fact that the basis of decisions against us - eg preventing free kicks; taking too long at throw ins etc seems to disappear once we have fallen foul of them. The latest FA decision - the fine for the players' reaction to MLS's red is an example of this. I did not see our players going over the top (by reference to what is commonplace in the EPL), and at the time I don't think anyone saw anything very different to behaviour from other players towards the ref during the season. Add in the fact that the decision itself was patently wrong, and that that PGML refused to admit this (instead hiding behind - admittedly worng - online abuse of Oliver that my gut says is commonplace, but something used as a PR tactic in our case to deflect from the lamentable refereeing), and it does seem that it is always Arsenal singled out.
I am also pretty disgusted by the reaction to (and even the statement from the Premier League's chief football officer about) the MLS celebration. I mean WTF. It seems like its fine to single out an 18 year old Arsenal player celebrating his first senior goal...
If our judicial system reflected the lack of consistency shown to our club by PGML and the FA then it would be rightly considered unfit for purpose and even corrupt.