What sort of cunt would? Don't mistake this for anger at his managerial quality (which is obviously heavily overrated). I didn't feel this way about Ferguson although he was also a nasty little prick that never said a word when his fans were chanting Wenger is a paedophile. Put Mourinho's chequebook title-buying aside, he's just so obviously just a complete scumbag. World would be better off without him.Originally Posted by Letters
Agree. I respected Fergie, I don't respect Mourinho one bit.
I actually think he might win us a title or two and I'd still never want the **** anywhere near the club.
Hey.... that is totally unfair and unjust.
I listen to talksport and don't consider myself a simpleton.
Weren't you defending Diego Costa last week or was that sarcasm? Honestly, I don't have a problem with Jose acting like an idiot in this case. Most people have been saying for ages Wenger needs to be held accountable and I can't think of a better way for Wenger to get fired up and do his talking on the pitch. Jose can be a prick but there is an element of truth to what he says and that's what stings because a lot of people have said the same on here. It's totally unprovoked, petty and childish. But we're above them so let him talk. As long as we finish the job, let him talk and provoke.
Why do you respect Ferguson at all? Fuck him too. Once Wenger stopped being a threat he started playing the sympathy card and acting all pally. I found that shit more insulting because if we were still fierce rivals he'd have still be acting like an idiot towards Wenger.
You can't argue with his record and IMO he was significantly less of a prick than Mourinho - not that that's saying much.
Man Utd were the richest club in the league until City and Chelsea arrived. They spent there way to the top and regardless of where that money comes from, it's still outspending your rivals or poaching other Prem stars to win the league. It's the same method City and Chelsea have used to win the league which is something you have a problem with.
The initial success came about by building a good young squad, they did spend big to maintain that success but never on the scale that Chelsea and City have, and it was their own money, generated by previous success, not just from a benefactor.
They are now trying to dig themselves out of the Moyes shaped hole by buying their way back to the top of course.
Although again they are buying with the money they earned and not bankrolled by the billionaire. United know that to make money they have to be successful, and to succeed they have to spend money because the players are just not coming through any academy anymore.
Same methods. Their money came from being floated on the stock exchange or some smart business moves but it's irrelevant. When we talk of City and Chelsea's league we wins, we look at their net spend, player wages and so forth. It's the same method. It's still the richest winning the league and dominating.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote