Quote Originally Posted by Özim View Post
Not quite levelled out in terms of the sending off as there's happened early on in the 2nd half whereas the other one would have been much later but no matter.

Dixon's opinion was:



That's his opinion and the guy knew how to defend and would know when it should or shouldn't be a penalty, the fact everyone other than Arsenal fans agreed tells you a lot, they have no reason to be anti-Arsenal.

As I said on the match thread, people on here are heavily biased with decisions, which is fine but don't then be surprised and call people names when they disagree.
How do you assess that a second red wouldn't have impacted on the game, what is that opinion based on? And does it matter if it affects the final outcome of the game? The rules exist for a reason. The ref is there is enforce them. So if you believe the ref should've called for a second pen, then you should also be of the opinion that there should've been a second red for Leicester. I cannot think of one Arsenal fan that would argue otherwise after seeing our player so blatantly taken out like that. An atrocious foul like that has to be punished in the first or last minute. But it's clear why you believe otherwise and it has nothing to do with affecting the score line. Your bitterness towards Wenger is unparalleled.

And Dixon's experience in defending doesn't detract from the fact we all have eyes and saw what happened.

You have to be the dullest Arsenal fan I've ever come across. Absolutely no joy in you after scoring in the last minute of a football ball game. It's beyond surreal at times.