He's 20 million due to his age, 29 is peak age for a footballer after this it's generally downhill, even more so because he relies on his pace. I just don't get this signing to be honest, it'd be different if we already had a goalscorer, but we don't and yet this is the guy we put our faith in, a guy with an overall average record.
Let me also remind you Man City paid 20 million for Gundogan.
Last edited by Özim; 08-06-2016 at 07:50 AM.
Yeah Leicester because to be honest they didn't have a lot of money to spend and weren't a big club so players in non league was maybe a good option for them, Leicester had an exceptional season last season as did a few of their players, to me it would appear it's as good as it gets for some these players, Mahrez is the one that stands out really, he's clearly got a lot of natural talent.
Vardy IMO has had one good season in 4 and considering 2 were in the championship that's not that great, I personally think if we do signing the guy will struggle and the pressure will build if he fails to score in his first few games and he could end up with a handful of goals at the end of the season.
That Janssen guy would be a better bet because he seems to be cheaper, younger and would have some resale value.
We don't need him if he can't manage more than 24 goals in all comps. It's the same amount Giroud scored but we also had cup games to play. He has to be able to have a bigger season than what he had with Leicester otherwise it's a pointless move.It's rare for a player to make it so late in his career so he's a bit of an unknown quality, I doubt he'll have another season quite that good again but he is a goal scorer and we could do with one.
The Spuds do absolutely need one or two more strikers in their squad if they want to continue to challenge for the title and compete in the CL league. One of the things that let them down last year was no-one beyond Kane being available to score. This transfer would complete sense for them.
But isn't this the issue? Trying to improve on what we have right now is the important thing. Janssen may be cheap but could take longer to adjust and is more of a gamble in that respect. Right now we would be potentially be paying for less of a gamble, comparatively. All we have to judge Janssen on is one season and so you have judge like-for-like with Vardy. We are also paying more for a British player, one that was the second highest scorer in the league last season and you know already that you pay over the odds for British players transferring within the league.
Ideally it would be good to take both players and see what happens but if it's a choice between the two - and as sceptical as I am about Vardy - I'd go with him. What I don't understand from your perspective is why you keep talking about going for the cheaper option. You always berate Wenger for being cheap and here he is, taking a risk someone that a lot of 'experts' rate highly and think this would be a good buy. I hate using that as some form of credential, but the only reason I do is because I have seen that you place value in the pundits and use their opinions to confirm what you think is right. The price tag at these levels do not matter and it is ironic you are looking at penny pinching and saving money, when you dig into the manager in every other post about the same thing.
It's the same with the Xhaka thing, pretty much dismissing the player because we paid a healthy fee for someone unknown to us. As much bullshit we are fed by the media and 'experts' about players in other leagues, we don't know it all, in fact there are plenty of players that would improve our squad that are not highlighted by the UK media. If that wasn't the case, there would only be 20/30 players only ever worth buying. The other way to look at Wenger in this situation is, if he is willing to pay £30m for a player, he probably is very good. When has he ever taken a chance like this before?
Last edited by Kano; 08-06-2016 at 08:45 AM.