Have you watched much of Everton? Yeah we're shit but up until this season we were still decent to watch without being great to watch.Originally Posted by FakeYank
Everton though....
Have you watched much of Everton? Yeah we're shit but up until this season we were still decent to watch without being great to watch.
Everton though....
Moyes for me as it would be a shot in the arm, up the arse or wherever you want that we need.
I think Moyes would take us back to the basics of playing football, I think Ancelloti would be a welcome manager and I would like to see what he could do with us but can we get him?
In a way by going after him we are maybe disillusioning ourselves that we are a force and that we have the players to run rings around the likes of Real etc
I think with Ancelloti we may unfairly expect miracles to be woven, Moyes would be considered more steady and thus a piece of a rebuilding process. . . .there again Im not sure Ancelloti comes across as very lwvel headed
I like both and would be happy with either.
There.. corrected your little mistake.
What Moyes is doing with no money at all is miraculous. He commands the respect of the players and they give every last ounce of blood for him. The Arsenal players could give a fuck less about winning or losing... they just look at the team as a stepping stone to Madrid, Barca, City etc. With the skillful players we have, Moyes can make the players play a fast flowing game.. at least he will try and have players playing in their natural positions and in a formation that will take out the best out of them and you can be dead sure, we will practice defending... in fact, why Moyes, any random donkey on the street would do these.. what Moyes would bring is the need to play for the team and to not play with a handbrake.
Last edited by fakeyank; 04-10-2011 at 07:14 AM.
Was thinking about this last night, the factor that hasn't been mentioned much is our none footballing board. Guys like Kroenke and Usmanov, PHW and Gazidis arent exactly football people are they, none had playing careers and none has thus far showed a great interest in well, anything on the pitch. So its unlikely they would appoint anyone good. They would probably want someone like Wenger who doesn't make waves, makes money and keeps us there or thereabouts without over committing and making us solid financially.
Someone who is good with the media, recognizable but not necessarily liked, is available and has a great smile
Tony Blair
Drugs are bad.
If you don’t send this signature to ten people, you will become a Spurs fan.
Kronke yes.Was thinking about this last night, the factor that hasn't been mentioned much is our none footballing board. Guys like Kroenke and Usmanov, PHW and Gazidis arent exactly football people are they, none had playing careers and none has thus far showed a great interest in well, anything on the pitch. So its unlikely they would appoint anyone good. They would probably want someone like Wenger who doesn't make waves, makes money and keeps us there or thereabouts without over committing and making us solid financially.
Someone who is good with the media, recognizable but not necessarily liked, is available and has a great smile
Tony Blair
But Usmanov isnt allowed anywhere near the board so you cant level any of that at him.
Ancelotti didn't spend that much money while at Chelsea.
I know, i asked this yesterday, who represents him on the board? Dein isn't there and he is his bum chum so who his Ivan Gazidis?
http://www.rediff.com/sports/report/...y/20111006.htm
More reason why Moyes should replace AW
It would show a serious lack of ambition if we signed him after Wenger. It's a step backwards and we should be aiming higher.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote