Originally Posted by
Super Ghel
It is astonishing to me how you can miss the point of my post entirely under the pretext of chronic cognitive disability due to some alcohol induced dementia when you evidently exhibit no such frailties in forming coherent sentences or even attempt an analysis that has little bearing to the point I was making. It’s not as if I don’t understand or even sympathise with your view, or that my post is some complicated literary masterpiece or logical abstract beyond the intellectual capacity of an average yank or bengali (or whatever it is you are known as in this part of the woods); but how you can interpret my post as an endeavour to imply that Arsene is a scapegoat is beyond me and exists only in your deranged mind.
Look, I’m not even trying to disagree with your points or the various faults you’re pinning on Wenger (not that I don’t think it is not ultimately a futile exercise in objectivity, considering you have problems digesting two mere paragraphs); but in case you are not aware, I do belong to the school of thought that subscribes to the logic that BOTH Wenger and the board are to be blamed! Got that? I’ve stated it numerous times in the past and I’ll say it again. It’s a symbiotic relationship from which there’s little chance of escape. You understand my view now? Just so there’s no further confusion or another mental relapse on your part, I’ll offer a further detailed but simpler elaboration below for your benefit, so please try to flex your cerebral matter a bit and digest the rationale, cos’ I am not going to waste anymore time if you can’t even venture out of your natural state of mental paralysis as far as reading comprehension is concerned.
Basically, as I hinted above, the gist of my post is not to absolve Wenger of blame. And it’s got absolutely fuck all to do with some idiotic insinuation that I’m missing the point about Wenger’s shortcomings or flaws (footballistically or otherwise). That’s not what I’m contesting here! Look, I could easily contribute and join in with the mindless ad nauseum frenzy about Wenger (which I’m sure will help ease your mental constipation and a few usual suspects around here); but no, what I’m asking you to consider is:
What is the fucking point of bleating on endlessly about Wenger, if at the end of the day, you are prepared to cut the board some slack, give them time or whatever it is you think is appropriate (be it trying to understand their point of view, empathise with their motives or whatever it is you feel they’re entitled to)? Because if you do so, then any impartial person who is trying to evaluate the situation objectively from a neutral perspective has the right and is legitimately of sound mind, to conclude that you are a mong! And that is the essence of my point! Not difficult is it?
How so you ask? It’s simple deduction based on the principle of logical consistency! Explain? Well, if you do not apportion the majority of blame towards the board first (regardless of how justified you feel that Wenger is the problem), then from a logical standpoint, there is little, to no consistency in your argument compared to the board’s absolutely symmetrical stance on the subject. Don’t you see the obvious logical flaw? Then try and answer the following questions to see if it finally hits home.
Who the fuck are you in the grand scheme things compared to the board in determining Wenger’s fate and the immediate direction of the club? What is the fucking point and why are you going in circles or what are you hoping to achieve with this endless ad nauseum exorcism of Wenger? Is it not to see Wenger removed from the club at all cost? So if you want to Wenger out, but is prepared to give the board time or cut them some slack or whatever, then don’t you see there is a big gaping hole at the very fundamental levels of what you’re advocating?
So here are the facts again to any neutral observer: In one corner we have the board/owner who are in control of the club; whose stance on the subject is crystal clear and consistent. They are firmly behind their employee of the decade and regard you, the Wenger out clan as mongs. And in the other corner, we have you, the dependable Wenger out hit squad, who makes no counter claim or dispute to the board’s assertion that you are mongs (either by abstinence or implied level of blame) but chose to focus your anguish on the one person in the equation who has no power of self-appointment to keep this travesty in a perpetual loop. Then tell me, how is any neutral, objective person supposed to resolve the conundrum since the views of both camps (You vs. Board) are diametrically opposed to each other? Who is right and who is the mong? Don’t you see, regardless of who you feel is more to blame, if you are not prepared to target the board as the source of the problem, but want Wenger out of the club ASAP, there’s only one logical verdict to any unbiased observer?
Still adamant that you are right? That the board should be given time or take a lesser apportionment of the blame? Then let’s go a step further and see if the principle of logical consistency applies to the issue of whether Wenger should consider resignation. To any neutral arbitrator, the following questions needs to be answered. Who has the right to determine the immediate direction or focus of the club? Is it the supporters who want a steady stream of trophies and bragging rights? Or does that right belong to the stakeholders who paid the millions to exercise legal control of the club? As an employee, who should Wenger cater to?
So why should Wenger contemplate resigning if he is delivering what is asked of him and meeting the performance targets set out by his employers? Why should he give up his hard earned pay or bite the hand that feeds him? Has he not earned the right to be remunerated like any employee? When the ‘hand’ wanted pitchside glory, he delivered trophies, when the same hand later wished for “shareholder value”, he delivered on that front as well, and then some. Heck, he’s even compared to the likes of Warren Buffet in his field. Surely there can be no greater accolade? So the pertinent question remains to any impartial observer, who the fuck are you Wenger-outs and what makes you more of an expert in determining what is best for the club when you can’t even resolve or offer a consistent logical agenda? Why the fuck should Wenger pay any attention to you when you make no counter claims or arguments to the board’s assertion that you are mongs? See how this logic failure leads to many problems?
So FY, after all that, do you still maintain that the board should be given time and not shoulder the majority of the blame? Then if all my “amazing English” above is too much for you to handle and the logic still escapes you, then just take home this message if nothing else. TO THE NEUTRAL ABRITATORS OUT THERE, YOU ARE A MONG IF YOU DO NOT CHANGE YOUR STANCE ON THE ISSUE. Not hard to understand is it? Perhaps you care to dispute their logical conclusion?
Reply With Quote
