User Tag List

Page 3 of 6 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 53

Thread: Match Thread Arsenal v West Brom 26/12/16 1-0 home win

  1. #21
    Member Power n Glory's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    14,195
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Olivier Giroud was undoubtedly Arsenal’s hero against West Bromwich Albion. With the Gunners struggling to break down Baggies manager Tony Pulis’ stubborn defence, the Frenchman rose to send a looping header over the outstanding Ben Foster. The Emirates erupted with relief. However, Giroud’s vital contribution should not be enough for him to keep his place in the side.

    Speaking to Arsenal.com about his emotions after the game, Giroud said:

    It has been a big relief. We pushed and pushed towards the end, and we kept believing in our game. It’s a big finish, an amazing feeling. It’s nice for us because we always try to find a good solution and we’ve been a bit unlucky recently. Thank God we succeeded.

    [...]

    I would like to say that we were very strong as a team, with a good, strong mentality and it was very important to win. We have shown a big mental strength once again.


    However, his joy might be short-lived. When Arsenal face Crystal Palace on New Year’s Day, Giroud ought to be back on the bench.

    It might sound counter-intuitive to relegate your match-winner to the substitutes' bench. However, the argument against that suggestion is that had Arsenal started with a more cohesive attacking unit, they might have been out of sight long before Giroud planted his header into the far corner.

    This, after all, was Giroud’s first Premier League start of the season. The fact that the Frenchman, who was Arsenal’s starting centre-forward for the majority of last season, has had to wait until the end of December to be named in the starting XI is quite remarkable. Were it not for the obvious need for rotation over the festive period, one would almost wonder if Arsene Wenger brought Giroud into the side simply to ensure he got a game before 2016 was out.


    Olivier Giroud was making his first start of the Premier League season.

    The fact is that Arsenal have evolved beyond starting Giroud this season. Redeploying Alexis Sanchez through the middle has been the foundation of their success in 2016/17, bringing speed and variety to their attack.

    Reverting to using Giroud feels like a regressive step. He offers no threat in behind and tends to be relatively static, focusing on hold-up play within the width of the penalty box. With Giroud leading the line, Arsenal can be pedestrian and predictable.

    What’s more, Arsenal have grown accustomed to playing with Alexis as their spearhead. It has transformed their style of play, so the idea that they can substitute Giroud in and expect a fluid performance is absurd. Starting the Frenchman necessitates a complete change of approach, and against West Brom, they appeared incapable of adapting quickly enough.

    Giroud’s greatest strength is his aerial ability, yet Arsenal did not deliver him with the supply he needs. They could not adjust their strategy to swinging in crosses—and they didn't have the players to do so either.

    If Arsenal are going to play with Giroud, they need to surround him with traditional wingers who are willing to get to the byline and whip balls into the six-yard box. With both Theo Walcott and Alex Oxlade-Chamberlain unavailable for selection, Wenger named Alexis and Alex Iwobi on the flanks. Neither player is inclined to operate on the touchline, instead drifting infield to function as auxiliary playmakers.

    Without the requisite service, Giroud is marginalised.

    In the end, it was Mesut Ozil who took matters into his own hands. After the introduction of Lucas Perez, Ozil switched from the centre to operate from the right flank. When he cut infield in the 86th minute, he floated a marvellous cross into Giroud’s path. The weight on the ball was so good that the Frenchman was able to nod it over the advancing keeper and into the far corner.

    A relieved Olivier Giroud celebrates Arsenal's winner.
    Kirsty Wigglesworth/Associated Press
    After the match, Wenger expressed his satisfaction with Arsenal’s display—including Giroud’s late contribution. He told Arsenal.com:

    Yes, we created plenty of chances. We needed today to be patient, keep our composure in our game and not make a defensive mistake - that’s what we did … Overall I believe West Brom were well-organised, we passed the ball quite well and quickly but we didn’t find the incisiveness that is needed because they basically played six across in their final third. We have little pockets where you usually get in but we found it difficult today. But we kept going and in the end when we couldn’t make the difference on the ground, we made it in the air with maybe the only player in our team who can do that.

    Wenger is probably right that no other Arsenal player could have scored that goal. However, Giroud has been highly effective this season doing precisely that by coming off the bench. There is nothing to prevent him making that kind of decisive impact as a late substitute—but had Arsenal begun with Alexis through the middle, they might not have needed rescuing with a last-gasp winner.

    Arsene Wenger must make changes for the match with Crystal Palace.

    When Arsenal play Palace later this week, Alexis must be restored to his best position. Wenger might see fit to make one or two other changes—if Walcott is fit, he’ll certainly be in line for a start. Kieran Gibbs picked up a knock which forced him to be substituted, so Nacho Monreal is another who could come into the starting line-up.

    There’s also a case for a change in midfield. Granit Xhaka and Francis Coquelin were the men Wenger tasked with controlling the middle of the park, but the limitations of Coquelin’s passing range were exposed. West Brom were willing to relinquish possession, which left Arsenal needing players with more penetrative passing.

    The late introduction of Aaron Ramsey helped turn the tide in Arsenal’s favour, and it would be no great surprise to see him included from the start against Crystal Palace.

    Eagles manager Sam Allardyce is likely to have watched West Brom’s performance with great interest—he’ll be adopting a similarly defensive approach when he brings his new team to the Emirates Stadium.

    However, the key change will be putting Giroud back on the bench. The powerful forward showed against the Baggies that he can still play an important role for Arsenal—but that role should not extend beyond cameos from the bench. He is a superb substitute but no longer a starter.

    James McNicholas is Bleacher Report's lead Arsenal correspondent and will be following the club from a London base throughout 2016/17. Follow him on Twitter here.
    Giroud should be our super sub. Not our starter. Always has been a plan B striker.

  2. #22
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Posts
    4,118
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    It amuses me to hear of Wenger and players talking about mental strength, when pundits and fans alike think we totally lack mental strength when the heat is on.

    Also, Perez was pinging balls into the box when he came on, I'd like to see him get a bit more game time, we paid enough for him!

  3. #23
    Administrator Letters's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    40,715
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Saw the highlights, looked like we actually played quite well and could and should have won by more.
    It is hard to compete with a side who win 12 in a row, their run can't keep going on forever but it seems right now that other teams are better placed to capitalise when they do start dropping points.

  4. #24
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Posts
    4,118
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Highlights always look better, MOTD showed about 5 mins of first half highlights when there was much tippy tappy going on and not worth showing. Forster did do some good saves but a few of them were in a 5 min spell when we were all over them and Sanchez hit the bar. They had some chances too and should have scored when their player skied it over when it was easier to put it in the net. I agree Chelsea will slip up and it show how a good run can take you up the league. They lost to Pool and us and haven't looked back.

  5. #25
    Herbert_Chapman's_Zombie
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Letters to Santa View Post
    Saw the highlights, looked like we actually played quite well and could and should have won by more.
    It is hard to compete with a side who win 12 in a row, their run can't keep going on forever but it seems right now that other teams are better placed to capitalise when they do start dropping points.
    No you're right we can't do anything about what Chelsea are doing, and that's why i say regardless of Chelsea's 12 match winning run the defeats to Everton and City were unacceptable.

    The performance against Everton was poor, the performance against City was diabolically shambolic....if we'd put in a better performance against both and still lost...what can you do?....but i suspect if we'd performed to our potential we'd have lost neither.

    Chelsea have the advantage because they are not having to play champions league football which has taken a lot out of us, but we have not rotated enough. Not set out teams to play against specific opposition and not had a semblance of a game plan.

  6. #26
    Member Power n Glory's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    14,195
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Goonermerree View Post
    Highlights always look better, MOTD showed about 5 mins of first half highlights when there was much tippy tappy going on and not worth showing. Forster did do some good saves but a few of them were in a 5 min spell when we were all over them and Sanchez hit the bar. They had some chances too and should have scored when their player skied it over when it was easier to put it in the net. I agree Chelsea will slip up and it show how a good run can take you up the league. They lost to Pool and us and haven't looked back.
    Caught the highlights as well and it always looks better. Sanchez looked the most active from the clips but not much from anyone else. We were lucky not to go a goal down and we've seen it happen so many times before. This isn't the way to go.

  7. #27
    Herbert_Chapman's_Zombie
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Power_n_Glory View Post
    Caught the highlights as well and it always looks better. Sanchez looked the most active from the clips but not much from anyone else. We were lucky not to go a goal down and we've seen it happen so many times before. This isn't the way to go.
    I would argue though that being lucky not to go one goal down was more down to an individual error rather than the whole set up of the team

    Not that i'm saying the set up or game plan was correct. But i also think we would have had difficulty anyway simply because of the amount of west brom players sitting in front of us, we were actually putting low crosses in and trying to go in behind them at times (of course that would help more if we weren't playing Giroud because of his immobility) but they were always able to cut it out because of simple number of players they had in the box.

    I don't think we were brilliant, but neither were we terrible....this is not a side that is going to be torn to pieces by sides playing away from home....Liverpool, Bournemouth, Chelsea and us have beaten them as the home side and all by only a one goal margin.

    Palace are much more porous and i don't think Fat boy is going to have been there long enough to address that (plus he has a dreadful managerial record at the Emirates...think he's come away with a draw once in a cup tie) so i expect a few more goals against Palace on Sunday.

  8. #28
    ***** Niall_Quinn's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    69,033
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Are we serious title challengers though?

    No. Nothing so far this season to indicate we'll be challenging come May.
    Für eure Sicherheit

  9. #29
    Herbert_Chapman's_Zombie
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Noel_Quinn View Post
    Are we serious title challengers though?

    No. Nothing so far this season to indicate we'll be challenging come May.
    No of course we aren't

    I'm only talking in the context of one game, if we were serious about challenging for the title we wouldn't have lost both the everton and city games they were important barometers which we totally failed. We aren't going to recover a gap against a side that has only dropped eight points all season.

  10. #30
    ***** Niall_Quinn's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    69,033
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Sadly I think we may recover that gap, only to blow it all again at the next crunch challenge. I don't think Arsenal is done yet, they'll make us hope again before this season is out.

    Maybe I'm completely bonkers (no maybe about it) but I have a sneaking feelinginsanity telling me we might do well in the CL this year. Sounds beyond crazy when put into words and then typed on a screen. But I can't kick it.
    Für eure Sicherheit

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •