This is an Arsenal message board not a support group, there are no safe spaces here
Or at least there bloody well shouldn't be
I think in all seriousness the mockery is what makes this place worth while, we know that this place isn't thriving and 95% of the reason why is total apathy towards the club and the manager.
You must get bored of having the same discussions week after week, month after month, year after year and whether this place is too restrictive to some or too hostile to others is rather peripheral to that.
the best teams in Europe have over the last few years registas like Xhaka.
He is exactly the sort of player we need. The problem is we have the wrong manager to use him.
Good article on Xhaka's positioning and him getting Wenger'd
http://first-11.net/2017/01/arsenals...-granit-xhaka/
Arsène Wenger prefers a dynamic midfield which suits Francis Coquelin and has utilised Xhaka to play the 8 role without the ball and the 6 role in possession, which leaves him unable to fulfil his full potential. The 8 is not suitable for a regista of Xhaka’s calibre: it takes him out of his depth, asking him to press extensively and ask him to support offensive phases. Xhaka now initiates the first counter press, and if it is bypassed is caught chasing back, trailing behind the play, a situation which should not occur for a player who should maintain the 6 role throughout.
Last edited by mastermind84; 11-01-2017 at 03:47 PM.
Exactly. An Arsenal message board. What you're talking about has zero to do with football and the same goes for Letters campaign to hound out posters. This thread is something new. To a degree at least. You drawing up very old beefs about Zim's stance on Wenger is what's boring. People have heard it before. It's be done and dusted so I don't see the point in dragging it up every time he appears.
This is where it all gets a bit weird and personal with you and Wenger. You have French blood in you so what, is he your dad but he abandoned your mum when you were a baby and never saw you or something?
You don't attribute Arsenal's successes under Wenger to him alone, but you do seem to think our failings are entirely his fault? You can't have it both ways. The buck stops with the manager. He's part of a team, of course, but the manager is responsible for a club's success or failure, it's always the manager who gets sacked when things go wrong, no-one else. And before you say that Wenger hasn't been sacked for his failures, Wenger has always delivered what the board have required. I don't see what he had to risk has to do with anything. And while I'm talking about the board, although a manger is responsible for our success or lack thereof, it's the board's job to hold the manage accountable of he does fail. Ours don't because to them he is achieving success as they define it, and it suits them that he pretty much runs the show. And that is where I agree Wenger is hard to replace because he's not just a football manager, he's been allowed to take far too much control and you have to blame the board for that, they are his bosses after all.
Overall though I think he'll leave us in a much better place than he found us. I just hope he doesn't "do a Clough" and stay far too long and things start to go seriously downhill.
But still this does come back to my original point that, if there was something new, original or interesting to discuss Arsenal there probably wouldn't be this kind of thing in the first place.
Zim doesn't refrain from coming here because he stand the heat, he refrains from coming here because he's bored of the same old, same old with Arsenal FC. And that's one of the few things i can find some measure of agreement with him on.