User Tag List

Page 34 of 96 FirstFirst ... 2432333435364484 ... LastLast
Results 331 to 340 of 952

Thread: Pep the Muppet and Other Citeh Shit

  1. #331
    Member Olivier's xmas twist's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    16,417
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Niall_Quinn View Post
    They've been strengthening the squad, we've been strengthening the balance sheet. It has paid of for them with a stronger team. It has paid of for our shareholders with nice fat pay-outs on zero investment. All depends what the priorities are. For the Arsenal shareholders the priority (in fact the only consideration) is themselves.


    Yep the board all need to get out before the club will ever get better.

  2. #332
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    31,840
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by ItsMe View Post
    You forget we drew with Wolves as well, bad result for them no doubt but my point stands...they were way behind us a few years back, whereas we've been going backwards they've been doing the opposite.
    Exactly. 10 man Wolves as well.

  3. #333
    ***** Niall_Quinn's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    69,033
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Ach View Post
    Exactly. 10 man Wolves as well.
    With the creativity ripped out of our midfield, all our defenders dead and RvP burned out after an unimaginably impressive run of form. We needed players like Walcott and Chamakh to step up. Where were they?
    Für eure Sicherheit

  4. #334
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    31,840
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Excuses

    Im sure Spuds have them as well for todays game.

  5. #335
    ***** Niall_Quinn's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    69,033
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Ach View Post
    Excuses

    Im sure Spuds have them as well for todays game.
    No, not excuses. Read it again. We should have had enough even to contend with the misfortune of a ridiculous injury list. So I ask again, where were Walcott and Chamakh? The only possible excuse we could make here is these guys aren't good enough to cover when the main guys are out of the team or out of form.
    Für eure Sicherheit

  6. #336
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    31,840
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)


    Its a team game not the Walcott and Chamakh FC

    But of course, picking on those 2 is a classic NQ trait to avoid facing the very real possibility that Spuds can finish above us and probably will but reach all you want. You'll realise it sooner or later. Il be here for you when it does cos ive accepted it so it wont piss me off as much when it does happen

  7. #337
    ***** Niall_Quinn's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    69,033
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Ach View Post


    Its a team game not the Walcott and Chamakh FC

    But of course, picking on those 2 is a classic NQ trait to avoid facing the very real possibility that Spuds can finish above us and probably will but reach all you want. You'll realise it sooner or later. Il be here for you when it does cos ive accepted it so it wont piss me off as much when it does happen
    What I'm doing is joining dots. You have rated both these guys yet you highlight our draw with Wolves. We all agree RvP can't score all the goals for the club. So who are next in line to do that job? Chamakh and Walcott. Gerv too, to a degree, but it's his first year. So if we want to beat Wolves rather than draw against their 10 men we need (as you say) the team to perform. That means the constituent parts need to perform too. What was our problem against Wolves? We couldn't score enough goals. So what should I say? Where was Mertesacker? Where was Chesney? It was goals we needed. So do you still rate these guys even though our fall off the pace has coincide with RvP's goals drying up? Do you still think this pair are the right solution to go on and compete with the teams currently above us?
    Für eure Sicherheit

  8. #338
    Member Olivier's xmas twist's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    16,417
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Ach View Post
    Exactly. 10 man Wolves as well.
    wtf has them having 10 men got to do with anything, if spuds are better then us like we keep hearing they should have battered Wolves, not be happy because they drew with us silliest thing i heard.

  9. #339
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    31,840
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Niall_Quinn View Post
    What I'm doing is joining dots. You have rated both these guys yet you highlight our draw with Wolves. We all agree RvP can't score all the goals for the club. So who are next in line to do that job? Chamakh and Walcott. Gerv too, to a degree, but it's his first year. So if we want to beat Wolves rather than draw against their 10 men we need (as you say) the team to perform. That means the constituent parts need to perform too. What was our problem against Wolves? We couldn't score enough goals. So what should I say? Where was Mertesacker? Where was Chesney? It was goals we needed. So do you still rate these guys even though our fall off the pace has coincide with RvP's goals drying up? Do you still think this pair are the right solution to go on and compete with the teams currently above us?
    Chamakh hardly plays. Theo is played out of position.

    Next excuse?

  10. #340
    ***** Niall_Quinn's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    69,033
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Ach View Post
    Chamakh hardly plays. Theo is played out of position.

    Next excuse?
    But again, check carefully. I'm not the one making excuses or avoiding answering questions. Chamakh hardly plays? Why? Walcot plays all the time, what's his excuse? Walcott out of position? Really? Have you seen him in front of goal recently? So are you saying it's Wenger's fault these guys haven't delivered?
    Für eure Sicherheit

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •