Quote Originally Posted by Power_n_Glory View Post
When you take a kid on at that age it's the managers duty to school him properly. He's been sitting under Wenger for a long time and if your saying he can't do the basics...that's a bad teacher. It's not as if Theo isn't willing to learn or skipping class. Also, when you look at Wenger's success rate with young players....it's not pretty. We've been going at it with this youth project for years now and we haven't produced much. We have a whole generation of youth players that were touted as hot prospects and never made it under Wenger. Walcott is actually one of the better ones.

A load of playere go out on loan and never come back. This youth project has been a failure. If Wenger gets the credit for producing good players, he also gets the blame for the bad ones. We're not talking about some Pennant type of player either. This kid is happy and willing to learn. And I hate to say it, under Harry, he might have been a better player. He looked dangerous at Southampton.
Well the thread is comparing Ox to Theo. I guess if Ox steadily goes backwards and turns out to be a waste of space in 6 years we can test your theory. Meanwhile, for whatever reasons, Theo has taken 6 years to be half as good as Ox already is. So Theo vs Ox. No contest really. Sell the former, play the latter, problems solved.