User Tag List

Page 4 of 5 FirstFirst ... 2345 LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 214

Thread: Match Reaction vs Mongs

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Member footloose, the wanderer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    Panglao Island/London/Cornwall
    Posts
    107
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by milla View Post
    Wenger must not be given a new contract, period! We lost not because we don't have players but they were told not play the winning ways.
    What absolute cobblers

  2. #2
    Member I am invisible's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    Leigh-on-Sea
    Posts
    3,750
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Munchies View Post
    Reading that we should've taken Liverpool to court over Suarez, he did have a £40m clause, the cunts played it out perfectly

    John Henry has admitted that Suarez did have a £40m buyout clause but refused to sell him, gambling on Arsenal not taking them to court [AR]

    Ffs, should've pressed harder , offered £50m and we'd have signed him.
    I guess we can look forward to a week of apologies from all the ex Liverpool cronies then, who were slating us for the insulting / disrespectful / risible / disgraceful / classless / etc way we conducted our business last summer, with our offer of £40m and 1p? Which, as it turns out, was all we were obliged to offer...

  3. #3
    ***** Niall_Quinn's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    69,085
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by I am invisible View Post
    I guess we can look forward to a week of apologies from all the ex Liverpool cronies then, who were slating us for the insulting / disrespectful / risible / disgraceful / classless / etc way we conducted our business last summer, with our offer of £40m and 1p? Which, as it turns out, was all we were obliged to offer...
    Very much doubt it, although as it turns out Henry has the least integrity of anyone concerned. Maybe that's why he shouted loudest.
    Für eure Sicherheit

  4. #4
    Member I am invisible's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    Leigh-on-Sea
    Posts
    3,750
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Niall_Quinn View Post
    Very much doubt it, although as it turns out Henry has the least integrity of anyone concerned. Maybe that's why he shouted loudest.
    A part of me actually thinks good on him? I mean, players and agents are quick enough to ignore what's in these contracts when it suits them, so you have to say turn around is fair play. It's the way we were ridiculed and mocked by all and sundry that's irked me. Were things like the 'What are they smoking at the Emirates?' comment really necessary? Was all the faux-indignation really necessary? Was it necessary to make every slight detail of what was going on public and to make such a big bloody deal about it? And yet we're the ones who came out of it apparently lacking class and respect, even though we pretty much just kept our mouths shut throughout the whole debacle.

    We've also had to endure a season's worth of question marks about our lack of ambition, our competence in the transfer market, and even accusations of professional negligence on the part of the manager for not signing a striker, when, as it happens, we'd actually done everything that was necessary to sign one of Europe's best? I'd say 90% of the anger and in-fighting i've seen amongst our fans this season has stemmed from this one issue. Why didn't we sign a striker in the summer? (Well, actually we did everything necessary to sign probably the best option we could have got.) Why didn't we sign one in January? (This issue should have been irrelevant.) Giroud isn't good enough to start for a club like ours, our back-up options aren't good enough either, and we have no one who can score against our main rivals. (Suarez would have been plenty good enough to start, and Giroud would have been fine as back-up.) We're running some players into the ground because we don't have anyone else to play in those positions. (An extra body would have gone some way to helping that, especially one who can play right across the front line.) Özil is going to waste without having a world class striker to aim for. (Problem solved.) We don't have enough pace in the attack and lack variety in our shape and tactics. (Again, we'd be well on the way to addressing those problems too.) Even shock results like Saturday's would be easier to absorb, if we'd been scoring for fun all season long, and had more points on the board?! Sure, there'd still be some justifiable ranting and raving, but it might have meant the difference between just venting your spleen and moving on, and demanding that the manager, the board, the owner and half the team are burned at the stake?

    Anyway... rant over. I don't like getting this riled by football, and I don't particularly like directing any of this at Liverpool, who I don't actually mind, when there are far bigger a-holes in the game. I just wish Henry's little bluff hadn't come at our expense, because it really has caused a lot of grief for us...
    Last edited by I am invisible; 03-03-2014 at 10:59 AM.

  5. #5
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Lambeth, London
    Posts
    5,892
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by I am invisible View Post
    A part of me actually thinks good on him? I mean, players and agents are quick enough to ignore what's in these contracts when it suits them, so you have to say turn around is fair play. It's the way we were ridiculed and mocked by all and sundry that's irked me. Were things like the 'What are they smoking at the Emirates?' comment really necessary? Was all the faux-indignation really necessary? Was it necessary to make every slight detail of what was going on public and to make such a big bloody deal about it? And yet we're the ones who came out of it apparently lacking class and respect, even though we pretty much just kept our mouths shut throughout the whole debacle.

    We've also had to endure a season's worth of question marks about our lack of ambition, our competence in the transfer market, and even accusations of professional negligence on the part of the manager for not signing a striker, when, as it happens, we'd actually done everything that was necessary to sign one of Europe's best? I'd say 90% of the anger and in-fighting i've seen amongst our fans this season has stemmed from this one issue. Why didn't we sign a striker in the summer? (Well, actually we did everything necessary to sign probably the best option we could have got.) Why didn't we sign one in January? (This issue should have been irrelevant.) Giroud isn't good enough to start for a club like ours, our back-up options aren't good enough either, and we have no one who can score against our main rivals. (Suarez would have been plenty good enough to start, and Giroud would have been fine as back-up.) We're running some players into the ground because we don't have anyone else to play in those positions. (An extra body would have gone some way to helping that, especially one who can play right across the front line.) Özil is going to waste without having a world class striker to aim for. (Problem solved.) We don't have enough pace in the attack and lack variety in our shape and tactics. (Again, we'd be well on the way to addressing those problems too.) Even shock results like Saturday's would be easier to absorb, if we'd been scoring for fun all season long, and had more points on the board?! Sure, there'd still be some justifiable ranting and raving, but it might have meant the difference between just venting your spleen and moving on, and demanding that the manager, the board, the owner and half the team are burned at the stake?

    Anyway... rant over. I don't like getting this riled by football, and I don't particularly like directing any of this at Liverpool, who I don't actually mind, when there are far bigger a-holes in the game. I just wish Henry's little bluff hadn't come at our expense, because it really has caused a lot of grief for us...
    Admittedly now that the whole "Suarez" saga has come out we were just unfortunate/unlucky regarding it. Liverpool's screaming and posturing was obviously their way of deflecting attention away from themselves and putting it onto us and unfortunately it worked. Ultimately, we fell short because Suarez didn't try and force through the move, he choose to stay at Liverpool. It was pretty impressive of Liverpool to keep their star player, how comes they can convince their star player to stay without the offer of any European football yet we struggle to keep ours even though we regularly qualify for CL?

    Despite all the above regarding the Suarez saga, it should not be an excuse not to strengthen the attack, if Suarez wasn't available then we should have sought other options. We had all of the Summer to buy an upgrade on Giroud, regardless of that Suarez situation, we really should have had some kind of contingency/back up plan to buy someone else.

    Our inability to strengthen problem areas has become a major problem for me and highlights our lack of planning in regards to player recruitment. It has happended once too many times to be called an accident and I personally think a club of our stature needs to operate a lot more efficiently in the market.

    I accept that purchasing a world class striker in the January Market was nigh on impossible, yet we go looking for "crocked" central midfielders? Why? What on earth is that all about? It wasn't even a position we needed strengthening in?

  6. #6
    Member IBK's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Highgate, London
    Posts
    4,101
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by selassie View Post
    Admittedly now that the whole "Suarez" saga has come out we were just unfortunate/unlucky regarding it. Liverpool's screaming and posturing was obviously their way of deflecting attention away from themselves and putting it onto us and unfortunately it worked. Ultimately, we fell short because Suarez didn't try and force through the move, he choose to stay at Liverpool. It was pretty impressive of Liverpool to keep their star player, how comes they can convince their star player to stay without the offer of any European football yet we struggle to keep ours even though we regularly qualify for CL?

    Despite all the above regarding the Suarez saga, it should not be an excuse not to strengthen the attack, if Suarez wasn't available then we should have sought other options. We had all of the Summer to buy an upgrade on Giroud, regardless of that Suarez situation, we really should have had some kind of contingency/back up plan to buy someone else.

    Our inability to strengthen problem areas has become a major problem for me and highlights our lack of planning in regards to player recruitment. It has happended once too many times to be called an accident and I personally think a club of our stature needs to operate a lot more efficiently in the market.

    I accept that purchasing a world class striker in the January Market was nigh on impossible, yet we go looking for "crocked" central midfielders? Why? What on earth is that all about? It wasn't even a position we needed strengthening in?
    I agree with all this. Our twin concerns should be (1) Why Liverpool as they were in the Summer were sufficiently attractive a proposition for Suarez for him to stay with them over us, and (2) Why, having already fucked up over Higuain, we had no other proper targets.

    Turns out the Suarez saga unfairly made us look like a laughing stock. However we made ourselves into a laughing casserole with Kallstrom.
    Putting the laughter back into manslaughter

  7. #7
    ***** Niall_Quinn's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    69,085
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by IBK View Post
    I agree with all this. Our twin concerns should be (1) Why Liverpool as they were in the Summer were sufficiently attractive a proposition for Suarez for him to stay with them over us, and (2) Why, having already fucked up over Higuain, we had no other proper targets.

    Turns out the Suarez saga unfairly made us look like a laughing stock. However we made ourselves into a laughing casserole with Kallstrom.
    1) Turns out that Suarez staying at Liverpool is similar to a prisoner with 10 years left on his stretch "deciding" to stay. If they won't let you out and you want to keep working then you have to stay. I don't really have a problem with Henry fucking a player over, about time. Should happen a lot more, like once a week. Put the little loves in their place. Hate his cowardice when he painted up the other parties concerned in a colour that applied solely to him though.

    2) Higuain and Suarez were ambitious targets, nice to see. But both of these player's clubs did a lot of fucking around. Maybe we could handle a third and a fourth fuckabout.
    Für eure Sicherheit

  8. #8
    Member IBK's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Highgate, London
    Posts
    4,101
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Niall_Quinn View Post
    1) Turns out that Suarez staying at Liverpool is similar to a prisoner with 10 years left on his stretch "deciding" to stay. If they won't let you out and you want to keep working then you have to stay. I don't really have a problem with Henry fucking a player over, about time. Should happen a lot more, like once a week. Put the little loves in their place. Hate his cowardice when he painted up the other parties concerned in a colour that applied solely to him though.

    2) Higuain and Suarez were ambitious targets, nice to see. But both of these player's clubs did a lot of fucking around. Maybe we could handle a third and a fourth fuckabout.
    Henry is a cunt for the comments he made about us - but he managed what AFC failed to do for year after year and wouldn't we have loved to see some of the same in those years from our club?

    Agreed re the ambition of our targets - but its the failure to have any proper alternative plans that is the concern.
    Putting the laughter back into manslaughter

  9. #9
    Member I am invisible's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    Leigh-on-Sea
    Posts
    3,750
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by selassie View Post
    Admittedly now that the whole "Suarez" saga has come out we were just unfortunate/unlucky regarding it. Liverpool's screaming and posturing was obviously their way of deflecting attention away from themselves and putting it onto us and unfortunately it worked. Ultimately, we fell short because Suarez didn't try and force through the move, he choose to stay at Liverpool. It was pretty impressive of Liverpool to keep their star player, how comes they can convince their star player to stay without the offer of any European football yet we struggle to keep ours even though we regularly qualify for CL?

    Despite all the above regarding the Suarez saga, it should not be an excuse not to strengthen the attack, if Suarez wasn't available then we should have sought other options. We had all of the Summer to buy an upgrade on Giroud, regardless of that Suarez situation, we really should have had some kind of contingency/back up plan to buy someone else.

    Our inability to strengthen problem areas has become a major problem for me and highlights our lack of planning in regards to player recruitment. It has happended once too many times to be called an accident and I personally think a club of our stature needs to operate a lot more efficiently in the market.

    I accept that purchasing a world class striker in the January Market was nigh on impossible, yet we go looking for "crocked" central midfielders? Why? What on earth is that all about? It wasn't even a position we needed strengthening in?
    Ah mate, don't get me started on Kallstrom! That was just bizarre, and I suspect it'll be another one like Park where we never really know why the hell he was signed?

    As far as excuses go for the lack of a striker signing though, I think the ones we're looking at here are actually perfectly valid? If we're accepting that it's nigh on impossible to get someone decent in in January, then that pretty much leaves us looking at what happened in the summer, and, from what I'm now reading, it sounds like we generally did the thing, but just got screwed over by third parties not doing their jobs properly (by which I mean Suarez's incompetent agent and legal team)? They way a lot of people now like to tell it is that we abandoned a sure thing in Higuain for a total gamble in Suarez, but the truth is it was actually the other way round: the Higuain negotiations were dragging on and on and on, Real kept moving the goal posts over price, there was more competition from other clubs, and the player himself wasn't even 100% convinced about joining us - IMO, we abandoned that for a surer thing in Suarez, who had a set release clause that we were willing to pay, where there was no other competition from other clubs, and where the player was willing to join. Add to that he was (and is) a better, more versatile player and PL ready, and I'm not sure what other choice people would have made n the club's place? I'd certainly have done the same thing (bearing in mind, that, at the time, we didn't know what we know now). Unfortunately, these two deals conspired to waste virtually our whole summer (and, IMO, the Higuain talks wasted as much of our time as Suarez), and left us almost no time to sort anything else out of an acceptable standard - granted, there's an argument to be made that maybe we should have signed any old striker as a stop-gap, but we tried that with Ba (OK, maybe that was a bad choice on our part). And, as one of the blogs put it, we kind of already have 'any old striker' in Bendtner and Sanogo - I really don't think that kind of signing would have helped much.

    What there will be no excuse for is not having a new target / list of targets already lined up for this summer, for not doing our background research properly, and for not getting down to business the very second the window opens. That may be tough in a WC year, but we should be laying the ground work now, sounding out agents, players and clubs. And I agree that we need to become A LOT more efficient at how we operate in the market - this big-spending malarky may be relatively new to us, but we need to get to grips with it fast! Like, in-the-next-3-months fast...
    Last edited by I am invisible; 03-03-2014 at 01:15 PM.

  10. #10
    Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    1,214
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I'm not sure why anyone is so surprised by Sat - we see the same every year & we will do for every year Wumger is manager. On the field his only claim to fame in the last 9 years is our continued C.L. qualification. I'm afraid we need to miss out this year for the board to even think about getting rid of him or him doing the decent thing & walking. What's the use of qualifying, whatever money we make from it won't be spent on adding quality & the lack of quality will mean a last 16 exit anyway. Tactically he has lost the plot & is out of his league against top managers nowadays. The Sonogo chance at the end of the game sums up Arsenal. If you don't buy quality, you don't get quality. That miss & some of Girouds this year could mean millions of pounds of lost revenue - do we build this into the equation when Wumger won't spend the extra to get the likes of a Suarez.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •