or maybe he was just as 'heartless' as the rest of em? i see no reason to make excuses for that action whilst condemning other directors for doing the same - we know as little about dein as we do about fizman.
or maybe he was just as 'heartless' as the rest of em? i see no reason to make excuses for that action whilst condemning other directors for doing the same - we know as little about dein as we do about fizman.
You have a point, however Dein was very vocal about his football ambitions, making us one of the biggest clubs and being as successful as anyone out there was his plan, he was also heavily involved in signing our best players.
IMO he seemed more of a fan than the rest of them who have again IMO been largely driven by the financial side. Dein wasn't a saint, far from it but he was good for the club and offered a great deal, I'm not entirely sure what those we have now have to offer.
Lethal Bizzle @LethalBizzle
Man City want RVP - #LeaveItYeah![]()
#JTStopsPlay?Mario Balotelli @MarioBaloteLAD
Theo Walcott has text John Terry to let him know RVP's wife is home alone #RVPLive #JTStopsPlay
Fucking love twitter.
well exactly - that was a big mistake on dein's part, which may have been done with the best of intentions for all we know but look where it has landed up. he had a duty to make sure he understood the motivations of stan fully before introducing him to the club but he didn't do that properly and to make matters worse he then jumped into bed with the russian. dein done a lot of great stuff for the club but his messy exit saw blame fall onto both sides.
Maybe Dein did have the clubs best interests at heart and has had a lot of good ideas (well except the Wembley one lol)
Pretty Much all these people saw was Stan owned/Own's. a few sports teams so he must know what he is doing. More research should have been done and it was not.
Another thing is this Ownership Issues until one of Stan or the Russian cave in think could be messi for a long time.
He can see that all their 'achievements' are tainted by the way they've achieved them. As are City's.
He's a bit more discerning than the average football fan and he's not just a glory hunter.
City were a mid-table side. A billion pounds later and they're champions. Chelsea showed it could be done. City have shown you can do it with any club if you pump in enough money for long enough. They actually got a bit lucky this year in that Utd collapsed at the final hurdle but had Utd won it City would only have spend big again (they might do anyway) and win it next year instead. Utd would only have delayed City's 'achievement'.