Quote Originally Posted by NoeLDG View Post
We got in behind them on the flanks so many times it was untrue.

If we had someone who could cross a ball (not Ramsey or Gervinho), and someone who could put them away (not Gervinho or Chamahk) then we would have won by a cricket score.

The midfield bossed the middle of the park, I thought Gibbs was fine, Sagna was fine, Vermaelen was just Vermaelen (a shadow of what he was last year), and Chesney was not really tested too much throughout.

We controlled most of the match, but like Letters said, we didn't want it enough, and we lacked quality up top and on the wing.

And as everyone, bar Wenger seems to understand. RAMSEY IS SHIT. GERVINHO IS SHIT. CHAMAHK IS SHIT. And that is why we lost.
i can't agree. pushing us out wide where everyone knows we can't cross, our allowing us to pass the ball from side to side all night doesn't make us the better team. shots from outside the area and struggling to break through their defence doesn't tell me we were the better team. if we were the better team then we must've wanted it enough to be ‘bossing’ the game. The two sound like contradictions to me and long shots way off target all night and pathetic 1 yard passing all night doesn’t point to superiority.