
in general and I'd like to point out your last paragraph helps me with a different ongoing argument I am having with a "trust the process" HCZ about how good our suits have been in managing our affairs.
Initially when the Forbes list came out in 2007, we were the 3rd biggest club in the world financially based on value and only behind Man U and Madrid (we were practically the same size as Madrid though).
At that time Man U was only about one and a half times bigger than us. All the other clubs in England were miles behind us. Liverpool and Chelsea were roughly 2 times smaller than us, while Spurs and Citeh were 4 times smaller than us.
Almost 20 years later, we are number 8 in the world and we've actually improved quite a lot in the last 3 years after dropping to as low as no 11 in the world and no 6 in England. However Man U and Real Madrid have consistently remained in the top places of every list in the past 20 years never going below no 3 and are currently no 2 and 1 respectively.
In England specifically, Man U is currently twice the size of us, Liverpool & Citeh are one and a half times bigger than us, while Chelsea and Spurs are pretty much at par with us (they were ahead of us a year ago).
Clearly in the last 20 years we've had the lowest growth among our rivals financially (and probably in every other aspect despite consistently always charging the highest on average for season tickets), and it's obviously not only about titles as Man U and Tottenham wouldn't be doing so well despite their erratic form.
So when some of us who are familiar with this world lambast our suits for being shortsighted and acting like mini shopkeepers, its clearly something evidenced by something as unbiased as our value to the unapologetic outside world....which permeates even into things like the transfer market.