Quote Originally Posted by Herbert_Chapman's_Zombie View Post
I am no big fan of Hilary Clinton but really when you consider the presidents America has had, it seems a bizarre statement to call her the "most unsuitable candidate imaginable".
She's totally uninspiring and i think her and her husband are a pair of avaricious socio paths but if the Republican Party members can't take their own nomination process seriously than what can you do.
Unlike the Corbyn, I actually quite like Bernie Sanders and actually think he was in his campaign less concerned with being president of his own fan club, plus he is the only american politician in the mainstream to be scathing of wall street. But ultimately he isn't a president, he's the guy that points and tells you what's wrong and why it's wrong and how we can do it better....and they are incredibly vital to the political process but they don't make for heads of state.
I think to be an effective head of state there has to be the ruthless, sociopathic edge to you....Obama spent too long trying to get Republicans to like him when he really shouldn't have bothered.
Wasn't really looking at it from a political angle, and wrong thread to get into that anyway. More looking at it as a system that has become so corrupt and morally bankrupt (as with Kroenke and his gang at Arsenal) they can host huge public theatre extolling the virtues of honour and service and duty whilst running a serial criminal as a candidate. I can't recall it ever being so blatant. Much as I can't recall a football club more blatant in its desires than Arsenal, or a club whose agenda runs so contrary to the publicly stated aims. Bizarrely there's almost a cold honesty to their dishonesty. Yes - we are lying to you. Thank you for your interest in our affairs.