
Originally Posted by
Niall_Quinn
You keep mentioning players that have at least basic footballing skills. They wouldn't do their best jobs played out of position but they could still contribute. Still hold a ball. Still lay a pass. Still cross a ball. Still beat a man. We just wouldn't be using them to their best effect. With Theo it's very different. He lacks certain basic skills. Why is he going to prosper in a more demanding role? Pace alone? If talent is not the key attribute then why should it be merely pace? Why not just play somebody better than him and be done with it? Two different arguments going ion here. You're saying Theo would be better played elsewhere, I'm saying he's already inferior to Ox so why not ditch him and play Ox? Wing or in the middle, makes no odds. Ox is the better player. All you have to do is watch him play for 5 minutes.