Quote Originally Posted by Power_n_Glory View Post
There isn't a sensible level of investment in football. What's the difference between spending £60m each year to spending £160 in one season to bring you from a mid table team to a Champions League team? One team has spent to get to our level and we're talking about spending to win the league. If there is nothing wrong with us spending there is nothing wrong with City spending to win the league. Every team does it but City have done it in a shorter amount of time. Was speaking to my work colleage whose a Spurs fan and he had the cheek to say they've bought the league when they've spent millions just to get into the top four. There is no moral high ground for this and it's funny how people are outraged by it.

You're thinking along the same lines as all the city fans, owners, people in general that see big investments as a way to win trophies. When we swipe Southampton's best players for millions, not a word is said, but I'm sure their fans are pissed at the way the big clubs can just swoop in and take their most talented after years spent developing them. But this is football.
WTF? What EXACTLY is your argument? Wenger out because Arsenal have spent just as much money in the last 100 years as city spent this season and I'm a hypocrite so Wenger definitely out in favour of an unknown manager that nobody knows about? That's what I'm picking up from you at the moment, have I got it wrong?

My ACTUAL point was leave Wenger in place, he's just finished 3rd, has a year to go on his contract and we have that year to find a replacement. Meanwhile build up the team with a few signings we have owed to us after all the money we EARNED FROM FOOTBALL ACTIVITIES was pinched by the board. Time to give it back. Arsenal are almost the exact opposite of City.