Quote Originally Posted by fakeyank View Post
I am sorry I never read the article you never posted. Can you post that again?

And yes, I am suggesting AW is making a profit in transfers even though the board is not asking him to. Why? Because he lives in La La land in which he will win the championship with the Diaby's and Rosicky's along with youngsters coming in from the youth academy. The project has failed but he is too big headed a dick (see another tantrum..ooooh) to even accept his mistake and move on. He thinks his methods are the be all of football and he wont listen otherwise.. even though its clear as daylight to see his methods have failed.

Your expectation of Stan is to do something.. Did he do it? No.. will he do it? No idea! Your expectation is not necessarily going to play out the way it is. Again, so far, the board or Stan or even Wenger has EVER (there in capitals for u) implied that the managers hands are tied in making necessary transfers. Show me one freaking article.. will you find one? Nope. Will you show us a quote? Nope. YouWhat will instead go on about is what you expect to happen..

I do agree with the lady who posted that the board should be blamed for not firing Wenger. Unfortunately they are in awe of Wenger and his philosophy and see him as the new messiah of football. However, I see no reason (at least through my naked eye) to believe that the board has not backed Wenger in the transfer window.. every quote or news article would back that up.

And FYI, the prick, douches, c*nts come out for him coz I believe that he is ruining our club and taking us backward. I love my club and I cannot see it being ruined by a way past it manager and also in part by a board who do not have the cajones to fire the douche (One last curse to make me nap better)
Good grief. The article I never posted... FACT!

I have answered, in a lot more detail than your postings deserved, all of the points above. If you won't read the articles, won't acknowledge the responses provided, want to keep going in circles then there's no end to this. You asked what I expected of "Stan" and I answered. I didn't claim I was providing facts, the facts I stated related to what has already occurred, not what will occur in the future. You're trying to turn my own argument against me but you can't do the job properly because you don't understand the argument in the first place.

Now there's the awe thing, the half a billion awe trip. And acknowledgement that the key sin of the guys looting the club is not to have sacked Wenger already.

Not much for me to go on, is it?