Well it is relevant because your living off the finances you've helped generate and whilst United have spend a fair amount I'm pretty sure they haven't spent the money Chelsea have in the last ten years. Ferguson may have bought the odd 30 million signing a season, or two or three 15-20 million signings but he wasn't signing six-ten players in that price bracket like Chelsea have done.Originally Posted by Power_n_Glory
How the money is generated shouldn’t really come into it. On the flip side, you’ve criticised Rogers even though he plays a more attractive brand of football.
Ahh whatever….we can all agree they’re better manager than David Moyes!
Reply With Quote